2019
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.99.096008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What does kinematical target mass sensitivity in DIS reveal about hadron structure?

Abstract: We study the role of purely external kinematical approximations in inclusive deep-inelastic lepton-hadron scattering within QCD factorization, and consider factorization with an exact treatment of the target hadron mass. We discuss how an observed phenomenological improvement obtained by accounting for target mass kinematics could be interpreted in terms of general properties of target structure, and argue that such an improvement implies a hierarchy of nonperturbative scales within the hadron. *

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

6
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In inclusive electronproton scattering, the transition from the low-energy resonance region to the high-energy regime (i.e. DIS) offers broad grounds for exploration [489,491,[497][498][499][500][501][502][503][504]. Leading twist approximations 6 are found to be accurate at describing the region of invariant masses W above the resonances, at sufficiently large photon virtualities, Q 2 1-2 GeV 2 .…”
Section: Nucleon Resonance Contributions To Inclusive Electron Scatte...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In inclusive electronproton scattering, the transition from the low-energy resonance region to the high-energy regime (i.e. DIS) offers broad grounds for exploration [489,491,[497][498][499][500][501][502][503][504]. Leading twist approximations 6 are found to be accurate at describing the region of invariant masses W above the resonances, at sufficiently large photon virtualities, Q 2 1-2 GeV 2 .…”
Section: Nucleon Resonance Contributions To Inclusive Electron Scatte...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the JAM19 analysis [6] applies more conservative cuts that exclude lower-W data, taking W 2 > 10 GeV 2 . Moreover, since the implementation of the TMCs is not unique [47,48,110], the CJ15 analysis adopts the OPE based prescription of Georgi and Politzer [109], while the JAM19 fit employs the collinear factorization (CF) framework throughout, for which the TMCs were evaluated by Aivazis, Olness and Tung (AOT) [111]. The CJ15 parametrization also fitted the higher twist, powersuppressed correction to F 2 (see Appendix A), while the JAM19 [6] analysis was not sensitive to these effects because of the higher-W cuts imposed.…”
Section: A Local Quark-hadron Dualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are interesting theoretical predictions for the PDFs in the limit x → 1 [42][43][44][45][46], which have never been quantitatively tested. However, extracting information from data in this region requires careful treatment of subleading effects such as target mass corrections [5,7,47,48] and higher twists, as well as factorization breaking corrections. Furthermore, at W < 2 GeV, the inclusive structure functions exhibit peaks related to the contributions from the excited states of the nucleon.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the DIS theory, we include corrections that are known to be necessary to accurately describe the highx region. These include target mass corrections, as described by Moffat et al [43], parameterized higher twist corrections, and nuclear corrections for deuterium data. Further details regarding these corrections will be discussed in a future publication [44].…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%