1971
DOI: 10.1542/pedsv47is1fulls
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What Does Nutritional Growth Retardation Imply?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Catch‐up growth, the phenomenon that growth will resume normally once factors stunting growth are removed, is another example of canalization (Desmond & Casale, 2017; Hansen et al, 1971; Prader et al, 1963; Tanner, 1963). Catch‐up growth is well documented (e.g., Desmond & Casale, 2017; Lampl et al, 1978; Prader et al, 1963; Wall, 1991), although a delay in size attainment can still be expected because the nutritional demand for normal growth to resume is much greater than at a baseline (Hansen et al, 1971). In skeletal age estimation, canalization manifests as a decrease in accuracy as age increases for dental age estimation (AlQahtani et al, 2014; Santana et al, 2017) and age estimation from long bone diaphyseal length (Cardoso et al, 2014; Stull et al, 2014; Stull et al, 2021), as well as the overall broad similarity in the timing of epiphyseal union across different populations (Cardoso, 2008; Crowder & Austin, 2005; Lenover & Šešelj, 2019).…”
Section: Methodological Implications For Forensic Anthropologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Catch‐up growth, the phenomenon that growth will resume normally once factors stunting growth are removed, is another example of canalization (Desmond & Casale, 2017; Hansen et al, 1971; Prader et al, 1963; Tanner, 1963). Catch‐up growth is well documented (e.g., Desmond & Casale, 2017; Lampl et al, 1978; Prader et al, 1963; Wall, 1991), although a delay in size attainment can still be expected because the nutritional demand for normal growth to resume is much greater than at a baseline (Hansen et al, 1971). In skeletal age estimation, canalization manifests as a decrease in accuracy as age increases for dental age estimation (AlQahtani et al, 2014; Santana et al, 2017) and age estimation from long bone diaphyseal length (Cardoso et al, 2014; Stull et al, 2014; Stull et al, 2021), as well as the overall broad similarity in the timing of epiphyseal union across different populations (Cardoso, 2008; Crowder & Austin, 2005; Lenover & Šešelj, 2019).…”
Section: Methodological Implications For Forensic Anthropologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later growth and development, while potentially subject to a greater degree of environmental influences, are also buffered against environmental perturbation. Catch‐up growth, the phenomenon that growth will resume normally once factors stunting growth are removed, is another example of canalization (Desmond & Casale, 2017; Hansen et al, 1971; Prader et al, 1963; Tanner, 1963). Catch‐up growth is well documented (e.g., Desmond & Casale, 2017; Lampl et al, 1978; Prader et al, 1963; Wall, 1991), although a delay in size attainment can still be expected because the nutritional demand for normal growth to resume is much greater than at a baseline (Hansen et al, 1971).…”
Section: Methodological Implications For Forensic Anthropologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As far as children and juvenile individuals are concerned, growth processes correlate physiological age with chronological age fairly well [55]. While it is widely accepted that nutritional stress or disease can affect the growth process [56], once factors stunting growth are removed, growth typically resumes normally [57]. Given that contemporary U.S. populations are unlikely to be considered as nutritionally stressed for long periods, it is no surprise that all children and adolescent decedents in our sample were aged accurately.…”
Section: Age Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their ages ranged from 5.2 to 13.2 years . This age group was selected because of the relative uniformity of normal body composition with minimal sex differences when expressed as a percentage of body weight (7), and the greater potential for nutritional recovery in malnourished patients when compared with older age groups (6,8). Children with CF who were selected for the study pre sented as poorly nourished patient s despite conventional management.…”
Section: Subj Ectsmentioning
confidence: 99%