2018
DOI: 10.1108/apjml-08-2017-0167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What drives consumers’ mobile shopping? 4Ps or shopping preferences?

Abstract: Purpose Mobile shopping emerges, but the marketing factors driving consumers’ mobile shopping lack clarification. Literature gaps also exist to view mobile shopping from a consumer behavior’s perspective. The purpose of this paper therefore is to empirically explore the issue based on the lifestyle perspective, 4Ps marketing theory and the information system (IS) success model. Design/methodology/approach A survey method was adopted. Data were gathered from consumers who had experience in mobile shopping. Th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
35
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, perceived usefulness similar to performance expectancy (11 studies) and perceived ease of use (9 studies) similar to effort expectancy the two independent variables of technology acceptance model (TAM) emerged as the most utilized variables emphasising TAM's dominance in individual adoption research. Besides individual characteristics from dominant technology acceptance theories, researchers have scarcely employed theories such as IS success model e.g., [16,72] and flow theory e.g., [39,52] to evaluate impact of system characteristics such as system quality, information quality, and system flow experience on consumer mobile shopping acceptance. The preceding discussion reveals researches mostly deployed theories developed in the organisation context as theoretical lens and seldom employed consumer-focused theories such as extended unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT2) to examine mobile shopping acceptance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, perceived usefulness similar to performance expectancy (11 studies) and perceived ease of use (9 studies) similar to effort expectancy the two independent variables of technology acceptance model (TAM) emerged as the most utilized variables emphasising TAM's dominance in individual adoption research. Besides individual characteristics from dominant technology acceptance theories, researchers have scarcely employed theories such as IS success model e.g., [16,72] and flow theory e.g., [39,52] to evaluate impact of system characteristics such as system quality, information quality, and system flow experience on consumer mobile shopping acceptance. The preceding discussion reveals researches mostly deployed theories developed in the organisation context as theoretical lens and seldom employed consumer-focused theories such as extended unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT2) to examine mobile shopping acceptance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multifaceted trust-risk model and theory of planned behaviour jointly occupied fourth position by serving as theoretical lens on two instances each. Furthermore, there were eight theories/models such as (1) 4P's marketing theory [16], (2) Behavioural reasoning theory [37], (3) Elaboration likelihood model [38], (4) Flow theory [39], (5) IS success model [14], (6) Stimulus-Organism-Response (SOR) framework [40], (7) Technology readiness [41], and (8) Trust transfer theory [15] that researchers employed on one instance each. Finally, there were two studies [42,43] that did not employ any dominant theories to examine consumer mobile shopping acceptance.…”
Section: Dominant Theories/modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pricing can be manifested in different forms, such as value-based (which is depending on the purchaser's perception on the speech therapy service offered), can be according to the market competitiveness and going-rate (for instance, if the market price is at standard rate, the pricing would be more or less at that range), skimming (which targets the affluent clients with families/children diagnosed with feeding, swallowing and communication problems), discount, loss-leader (purposefully set the price at a lower price than the market price in order to attract client crowd) and psychological (such as put the price at RM99 rather than RM100). Promotion could directly point out the significance of their advantages and their respective marketing positions (Chen, 2018). To strengthen the customer relationship with the brand, a promotion can deepen a client's memory towards the pricing structure and strategies set by a speech therapy centre.…”
Section: Relationship Between Marketing Mixture Of Price Promotion Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The places where promotion takes place affects quality of marketing and thus brand loyalty. A good promotion place improves the credibility of the store image and stimulates consumption growth (Chen, 2018). Speech therapy centre sourced continuous referrals or demand from different settings, hence those places required a different type of promotion.…”
Section: Relationship Between Marketing Mixture Of Place Promotion Anmentioning
confidence: 99%