2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.intacc.2010.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What drives firms' decisions to lobby and determinants of their lobbying positions: Evidence from firms' comment letter submissions during FASB's stock option expensing proposal in 2004

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this sense, Koh (2011) states that because large companies have more resources, they usually tend to influence the final result and hence reap the benefits of lobbying.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In this sense, Koh (2011) states that because large companies have more resources, they usually tend to influence the final result and hence reap the benefits of lobbying.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because the manner in which binary variables are operationalized cannot properly capture the magnitude of the characteristic they aim to investigate. Deakin (1989), Georgiou and Roberts (2004), Georgiou (2005) and Koh (2011) are examples of studies that offer alternative methods of operationalizing these variables.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Tais diferenças podem também ser predominantes para a realização de lobbying político, tanto de países, como de setores de atuação, para a elaboração, alteração ou até mesmo extinção de normas. (HANSEN, 2007;IASB, 2008;NOBES;PARKER, 2010;KOH, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified