What Drives Long-term Oil Market Volatility? Fundamentals versus Speculation

Abstract

This paper explores the role of speculation and economy fundamentals in the oil market using a two-component GARCH-MIDAS model. Specifically, the authors highlight the different roles played by the changing oil shocks with respect to the short-term and long-term components regarding oil market volatility. The results indicate that a global demand shock is the only factor found not only to be positive but to also significantly increase long-and short-term oil volatility in the full sample. This is consistent with a classic host of research that advocates that global demand dominates the oil market. However, since 2004, impacts of other oil shocks have been significantly weakened or even reversed. For example, the speculative demand shock has helped to stabilize long-term oil volatility during the post-2004 period. The results also suggest the existence of asymmetric impacts on short-term oil volatility, particularly for shocks from oil supply, oil-specific demand and oil speculative demand. JEL Q43

Perspectives of illicit marijuana growers and traders on commercial legalisation of marijuana in South Africa: considerations for policy formulation

“…Participants’ fear of its price devaluation is not economically far-fetched as the effect of oversupply of a commodity on price decrease is an established economic principle. Hence, should marijuana be overproduced as a result of its legalisation, it will lead to a fall in its price [ 63 ]. The government should therefore consider setting up an agency to buy marijuana directly from farmers and be responsible for its supply onto the market for price regulation and stabilisation purposes, just as it is done in the Cocoa industry in Ghana [ 64 ].…”

The global price of oil, QE and the US high yield rate

“…Often, such volatility persists as hedging and speculation activities persevere. Yin and Zhou (2016) develop this theme of oil speculation and Morana (2013) also investigates oil speculation, preferences and volatility shocks using a macro-financial-econometric model with fiscal and monetary responses. Oil speculation during periods of major uncertainty influences the global price of oil, but in the longer-run its impact disappears.…”

The Price Determinants of West Texas Intermediate Crude Oil

“…Other researchers stated that WTI demand was a major determinant of WTI prices. Yin and Zhou (2016) with the GARCH-MIDAS (mixed data sampling) model explained that global demand shocks were the only significant positive determinant in increasing long and short-term oil volatility. Juvenal and Petrella (2014) with the VAR model and dynamic factor model (DFM) using data from 2004-2008 explained that global demand shocks were the biggest determinant of crude oil prices.…”

“…Obadi et al (2013) also used the VECM method, and concluded that the U.S. dollar exchange rate had an important role in the development of crude oil prices. Dées et al (2008) using ECM and 2004-2006 data, explained that supply, demand, refinery utilization, and futures market influenced WTI price in NYMEX. Krichene (2002) using the ECM method and the supply demand data of crude oil and natural gas in the 1918-1999 period has reinforced that the elasticity of commodity prices could explained the market power of oil and volatility in response to price shocks.…”