2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ememar.2008.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What drives stock market development in emerging markets—institutions, remittances, or natural resources?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
58
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
6
58
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Park and Ratti (2008) found that the relationship between oil price shocks and financial markets is adverse in oilimporting economies, while that for oil-exporting economies is positive. Similar results have been found by Billmeier and Massa (2009), who examined both oil-importing and oil-exporting countries.…”
Section: Literature Reviewsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…For example, Park and Ratti (2008) found that the relationship between oil price shocks and financial markets is adverse in oilimporting economies, while that for oil-exporting economies is positive. Similar results have been found by Billmeier and Massa (2009), who examined both oil-importing and oil-exporting countries.…”
Section: Literature Reviewsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…He found no causal relationship between Indian stock market and economic growth. Billmeier and Massa (2009) Using panel data, Cherif and Gazdar (2010) investigated the impact of macroeconomic determinants and institutional standart on stock market development. The study covered data of 18 years of fourteen MENA countries.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Billmeier and Massa (2009) show that remittances contribute significantly to stock market development, especially in countries without a sizeable natural-resource endowment. Aggarwal et al (2011) provide strong evidence that remittances improve bank deposits and, to a slightly lesser extent, credit to the private sector, after accounting for a variety of sources for endogeneity and reversecausality.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%