What drives voluntary corporate water disclosures? The effect of country‐level institutions

Abstract

The purpose of this cross‐country comparative research is twofold. First, it investigates the country‐level institutional factors that affect corporate incentives to voluntarily disclose water information. Second, it examines the way in which the interaction between formal and informal institutions affects corporate reporting decisions regarding water‐related risks. The results reveal that the country‐level legal system shapes the firm's propensity to voluntarily respond to the 2015 Carbon Disclosure Project water survey. Uncertainty avoidance and societal trust are negatively related to the propensity to provide voluntary water disclosures, whereas countries' future orientation is positively related to the likelihood of water reporting. More importantly, the results indicate that the effect of informal institutions on water disclosure practices is contingent on the strength of formal institutions at the country level. The paper contributes to the emerging water literature and provides insights on the effects of the interaction between formal and informal institutions on corporate behavior.

The determinants of voluntary climate change disclosure commitment and quality in the banking industry

“…We gathered disclosure scores from the CDP regarding the year 2018. CDP data have been extensively used in the previous empirical literature as a proxy for carbon disclosure quality and have become an international standard (e.g., Cotter and Najah, 2012 ; Luo et al., 2012 , 2013 ; Stanny, 2013 ; Ben-Amar and McIlkenny, 2015 ; Liao et al., 2015 ; Grauel and Gotthardt, 2016 ; Ott et al., 2017 ; Ben-Amar et al., 2017 ; Ben-Amar and Chelli, 2018 ; Li et al., 2018 ; Hsueh, 2019 ). Based on the assessment by the CDP, companies were ranked from A to F (A, A-, B, B-, C, D, E, and F) and coded from 7 to 0 accordingly (from best to worst quality).…”

Explicit and implicit corporate social responsibility: Differences in the approach to stakeholder engagement activities of U.S. and Japanese companies

“…Past research show that a country's institutional arrangements often act as antecedents of CSR and are in fact strong motivators for CSR engagement and stakeholder management (Campbell, ). Scholars have also argued that contemporary institutional theory (Aguilera & Jackson, ) is particularly useful for understanding cross‐national differences in CSR and stakeholder management practices (Ben‐Amar & Chelli, ; Campbell, ; Ho et al, ; Tempel & Walgenbach, ).…”

Interactive effects of various institutional pressures on corporate environmental responsibility: Institutional theory and multilevel analysis

“…The institutional contingency perspective guides us in exploring how to leverage the influence of firm‐level cognitive pressure on firms' CER based on institution‐level regulative and normative pressures. We followed the request for a research on multilevel model in the field of CER (Ben‐Amar & Chelli, ; Oh et al, ; Orlitzky, Louche, Gond, & Chapple, ; Su, Peng, Tan, & Cheung, ) and collected data from senior managers in 212 firms located in 34 industrial clusters in China. In China, the central and local governments have set several industrial clusters to promote economic development.…”