2023
DOI: 10.1007/s11145-023-10420-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What explains children’s digital word reading performance in L2?

Abstract: Word reading fluency is crucial for early L2 development. Moreover, the practice of digital reading has become increasingly common for both children and adults. Therefore, the current study investigated factors that explain digital word reading fluency in English (L2) among Chinese children from Hong Kong. Eighty-six children (age: M = 9.78, SD = 1.42) participated in a digital silent word reading test using a mobile phone, a computer, or a tablet. This is a 10-minute timed test of English word reading. Overal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 59 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As digital reading requires more cognitive resources for navigation (Coiro, 2011;Gyselinck et al, 2008;Srivastava & Gray, 2012), technical assistance is recommended for younger children in the WordSword Test for the reading performance to be properly reflected by the test results without the interference of the technological difficulty. As for the type of reading devices, our findings were in line with Chen et al's (2014) study and Ho et al (2023) that there existed differences among different types of devices. Ample evidence has advocated the advantage of reading on a bigger screen as it leads to fewer scrolls and less cognitive disruption (Sanchez & Wiley, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…As digital reading requires more cognitive resources for navigation (Coiro, 2011;Gyselinck et al, 2008;Srivastava & Gray, 2012), technical assistance is recommended for younger children in the WordSword Test for the reading performance to be properly reflected by the test results without the interference of the technological difficulty. As for the type of reading devices, our findings were in line with Chen et al's (2014) study and Ho et al (2023) that there existed differences among different types of devices. Ample evidence has advocated the advantage of reading on a bigger screen as it leads to fewer scrolls and less cognitive disruption (Sanchez & Wiley, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%