2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What explains the investment growth anomaly?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The correlation between the investment growth characteristic, IG , and the LMH factor loading, γ LMH , is only −0.3 per cent and statistically insignificant (with the p -value of 0.421). The low correlation between the investment growth characteristic and the LMH factor loading is also similar to results in Prombutr et al (2012). In contrast, the correlation between the book-to-market ratio or value characteristic, BM , and the HML factor loading, γ HML , is much higher at 11.1 per cent and strongly significant (with the p -value of 0.000).…”
Section: Investment Growth Book-to-market Ratio Size and Their Factorssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The correlation between the investment growth characteristic, IG , and the LMH factor loading, γ LMH , is only −0.3 per cent and statistically insignificant (with the p -value of 0.421). The low correlation between the investment growth characteristic and the LMH factor loading is also similar to results in Prombutr et al (2012). In contrast, the correlation between the book-to-market ratio or value characteristic, BM , and the HML factor loading, γ HML , is much higher at 11.1 per cent and strongly significant (with the p -value of 0.000).…”
Section: Investment Growth Book-to-market Ratio Size and Their Factorssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…They show that there is a strong relationship between the asset growth effect and financial market development, which is expected under the description of the q-theory. Prombutr, Phengpis, and Zhang (2012) also find support for the risk-based explanation. Xing (2008) measures capital investment with both investment growth rates and investment-to-capital ratios and use a large US firm-level data set from 1964 to 2003.…”
Section: Brief Literature Review and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…So two typical and classic characteristic-based return patterns, size effect (Chan, Chen, & Hsieh, 1985;Fama & French, 1992) and investment effect (Prombutra, Phengpisa, & Zhang, 2012;Watanabe, Xu, Yao, & Yu, 2013), are put the center of this study. Specifically, size effect reveals a return pattern that firms with smaller size (market capitalization) tend to have higher expected returns while big-size firms tend to have lower expected returns.…”
Section: Abnormal Returnsmentioning
confidence: 99%