What factors are associated with ambulance use for non-emergency problems in children? A systematic mapping review and qualitative synthesis

Abstract

ObjectiveTo explore what factors are associated with ambulance use for non-emergency problems in children.MethodsThis study is a systematic mapping review and qualitative synthesis of published journal articles and grey literature. Searches were conducted on the following databases, for articles published between January 1980 and July 2020: MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL and AMED. A Google Scholar and a Web of Science search were undertaken to identify reports or proceedings not indexed in the above. Book chapters and theses were searched via the OpenSigle, EThOS and DART databases. A literature advisory group, including experts in the field, were contacted for relevant grey literature and unpublished reports. The inclusion criteria incorporated articles published in the English language reporting findings for the reasons behind why there are so many calls to the ambulance service for non-urgent problems in children. Data extraction was divided into two stages: extraction of data to generate a broad systematic literature ‘map’, and extraction of data from highly relevant papers using qualitative methods to undertake a focused qualitative synthesis. An initial table of themes associated with reasons for non-emergency calls to the ambulance for children formed the ‘thematic map’ element. The uniting feature running through all of the identified themes was the determination of ‘inappropriateness’ or ‘appropriateness’ of an ambulance call out, which was then adopted as the concept of focus for our qualitative synthesis.ResultsThere were 27 articles used in the systematic mapping review and 17 in the qualitative synthesis stage of the review. Four themes were developed in the systematic mapping stage: socioeconomic status/geographical location, practical reasons, fear of consequences and parental education. Three analytical themes were developed in the qualitative synthesis stage including practicalities and logistics of obtaining care, arbitrary scoring system and retrospection.ConclusionsThere is a lack of public and caregiver understanding about the use of ambulances for paediatrics. There are factors that appear specific to choosing ambulance care for children that are not so prominent in adults (fever, reassurance, fear of consequences). Future areas for attention to decrease ambulance activation for paediatric low-acuity reports were highlighted as: identifying strategies for helping caregivers to mitigate perceived risk, increasing availability of primary care, targeted education to particular geographical areas, education to first-time parents with infants and providing alternate means of transportation.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42019160395.

Determinants of caregiver's knowledge and practices regarding childhood fever management in a developing setting: a multi-centre cross-sectional assessment

“…This might have prevented the visits (and its attendant wasteful use of resources and increased burden on healthcare services) of about one-half (43.7%) of the febrile children that were diagnosed of acute uncomplicated malaria in the centers. This needless visit due to poor knowledge of childhood fever has also been reported in developed settings (55) including the non-urgent use of ambulances (56).…”

Calling an ambulance for non‐emergency medical situations: Results of a cross‐sectional online survey from an Australian nationally representative sample

“…18,24 Interestingly, another study presenting hypothetical non-emergency scenarios also found older people more likely to call for an emergency ambulance than younger people. 25 We noted those who had completed a university degree and had higher household income were less likely to call an ambulance for nonemergency scenarios (previous research also links heightened education with more appropriate ambulance use, 26 as were people with higher emotional wellbeing as measured via the BEES. Although several studies have investigated the impact of patients utilising EHS for acute mental health issues, few have investigated the association between poor mental and/or emotional wellbeing and potentially unnecessary use of EHS.…”

“When you’re hurt and you need serious help you call 999.” Educating children about emergency services and appropriate use of 999: An evaluation study of the Blue Light Hub app

“…These included socioeconomic status, geographical location, practical reasons (ie, lack of transport), emotional reasons (ie, uncertainty, reassurance) and level of education, knowledge and experience in judging the appropriateness of ambulance use for their circumstances. 17 18 Although a small-scale intervention may not radically change the behaviour of the population, better knowledge and awareness repeatedly consolidated by the use of educational apps may encourage individuals to evaluate their options more thoroughly before seeking emergency care. Quite possibly, interventions such as the Blue Light Hub app may have the most impact in more deprived areas; future research would do well to investigate this possibility on a larger scale and explore the generalisability of this type of education-based intervention in other locations and contexts.…”