What goes around comes around: How meso-level negative emotional contagion can ultimately determine organizational attitudes toward leaders

Abstract

a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c tWe present a follower-centric model of leadership that integrates multiple levels of analysis, and includes emotional contagion as a key meso-level process. In our model, leadership at the individual level is manifested in terms of the leader's favoritism toward members and affective displays. Drawing upon affective events theory, we argue that member perceptions of a leader's behaviors and member attributions of insincerity result in negative emotions. Through a process of emotional contagion, the negative emotions then spread to other individuals in the group. These are in turn reflected in the group's affective climate and trust climate, and also in the quality of leader-member and team-member relationships. In the end, this results in organizational-level disapproval of the leader and cynicism towards the leader. Included as moderators in the model are task interdependence, the temporal context, reward systems, emotional labor requirements, organizational culture, and power distance. We conclude with a discussion of boundary conditions, and implications of our model for research, theory, and practice.

A Theory of Collective Empathy in Corporate Philanthropy Decisions

“…Additionally, we present two organizationlevel factors affecting the degree to which collective empathy in response to human needs outside the organization infuses executives' corporate philanthropy decisions: emotion selling, a key mesolevel mechanism that enables the micro-macro linkages in our model (Dasborough, Ashkanasy, Tee, & Tse, 2009), and managerial discretion, a key factor that determines the degree of flexibility present in organizational decision-making frameworks (Kidder & Buchholtz, 2002).…”

Promoting women to MD in investment banking: multi-level influences

“…To be considered promotable to MD level, the individual needs to be perceived by others at that level as already behaving like an MD (Ibarra, 2000) and definitions of "suitability" (Noon, 2012) for leadership are constructed at a group (Rowland & Parry, 2009) and organizational level (Dasborough, Ashkanasy, Tee and Tse, 2009). At the same time women make judgements about suitability and "fit" (Jenkins, 1986;Peters & Ryan, 2010), between themselves and those above them, at an individual level.…”

Industrial Leadership that Inspires Managerial Communication as an Emerging Pedagogical Focus in Engineering

“…They manage meaning and interpretations for the entire organization, even when not expressing their thoughts consciously, intentionally or out loud. Their responses and bodily conduct are followed closely and modelled on, and this is how they set the emotional standard for the work environment [64].…”