What hampers innovation? External stakeholders, the organization, groups and individuals: a systematic review of empirical barrier research

Hueske, Anne-Karen; Guenther, Edeltraud

doi:10.1007/s11301-014-0109-5

Cited by 87 publications

(68 citation statements)

References 153 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…They point out two perspectives how barriers are perceived: the firm perspective, representing the internal dimension and the government perspective, as one of the main representations of the external dimension (ibid). Acknowledging such of a multilevel perspective can also help to better understand ambiguous findings such as barrier of company A is a driver for company B (Hueske and Guenther, 2015). Hueske and Guenther (2015) propose a barrier framework that enables a more encompassing identification, on different level of analysis, of innovation barriers and draws from theory.…”

Section: Barrier Framework Methodologymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This work builds on a multilevel perspective from current relevant research (Hueske and Guenther, 2015) to investigate all barriers to commercial success. A dynamic capabilities approach (Teece et al, 1997;Eisenhardt and Martin, 2000), in combination with stakeholder theory (Freeman, 2004;Tantalo and Priem, 2016), was chosen to analyze both internal and external barriers that exist alongside the innovation value-added chain.…”

Section: Barrier Framework Methodologymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Applying this analysis on multiple levels enables a focus on interactions of barriers within and across the levels of analysis. Furthermore, it acknowledges the specificity of context and thereby allows for a broad set of recommendations (Hueske and Guenther, 2015) and an increased contextual understanding. Both, the organizational and the external level define (cross-)barrier categories and subcategories are set out within the different levels.…”

Section: Barrier Framework Methodologymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This approach helps to identify value creation opportunities both within and across relevant stakeholder groups (ibid). Seven key stakeholder groups can be observed: (1) investors, (2) future employees, (3) partners and suppliers in research, engineering and manufacturing, (4) competitors, (5) customers, (6) governments, and (7) society (Hueske and Guenther, 2015).…”

Section: Barrier Framework Methodologymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Hueske and Guenther, 2015). Such an in-depth analysis could also enrich data on the social dimension of sustainability, that is currently underrepresented due to the predominant focus on the technology development of most of the investigated new technology ventures.…”

Section: Limitations and Future Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Overcoming Barriers to Successfully Commercializing Carbon Dioxide Utilization

Kant

2017

Front. Energy Res.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The successful transition to a low-carbon economy hinges on innovative solutions and collaborative action on a global scale. Sustainable entrepreneurship is thereby recognized as a key driver in the creation and transformation of ecologically and socially sustainable economic systems. The purpose of this article is to contribute to this topic by understanding commercialization barriers for strong sustainability-oriented new technology ventures and to derive recommendations to overcome them. A qualitative multilevel approach is applied to identify barriers and drivers within the internal dynamic capabilities of the organization and within the organization's external stakeholders. A model of barriers has been developed based on semi-structured interviews with new carbon dioxide utilization ventures and associated industry players in Canada, the USA, and the European Economic Area. Resulting recommendations to facilitate the (re-)design of a dedicated support system are proposed on four levels: (a) actors, (b) resources, (c) institutional settings, and (d) the coordination of the support system.

show abstract

Section: Barrier Framework Methodologymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Barrier Framework Methodologymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Barrier Framework Methodologymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Barrier Framework Methodologymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Limitations and Future Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Overcoming Barriers to Successfully Commercializing Carbon Dioxide Utilization

Kant

2017

Front. Energy Res.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

On the conceptualization and measurement of dynamic capabilities for sustainability: Building theory through a systematic literature review

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We performed a systematic literature review to explore and understand how the 23‐year long debate about dynamic capabilities has addressed sustainability issues. Based on this, we propose a unifying framework that distinguishes different facets of dynamic capabilities for sustainability (DCsS) based on the different types of performance they are more suitable to predict. The theoretical contribution is twofold. First, we add to the literature by highlighting the dependence of different forms of DCsS on different levels of the centrality of sustainability outcomes in corporate strategies. Second, we shed light on the operationalizations of DCsS by providing guidance on the adoption of pertinent constructs and measurement models. The review concludes with a discussion of the managerial implications of the proposed conceptual framework to help decision makers better understand, which strategic moves to make to achieve their intended sustainability goals.

show abstract

New perspectives on carbon reinforced concrete structures—Why new composites need new design strategies

Curbach,

Hegger,

Bielak

et al. 2024

Civil Engineering Design

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In civil engineering, carbon is typically regarded as a modern material to serve as reinforcement in concrete structures. Compared to steel reinforcement, it features two substantial benefits: It is not sensitive to corrosion, and has an enormously increased tensile strength. In contrast, carbon reinforcement is sensitive to lateral pressure and lacks the property of strain hardening. As a first step of establishing carbon reinforced concrete as a new building composite material, carbon reinforcement has basically served to replace the state‐of‐the‐art steel reinforcement. This target led to pioneering findings with respect to determining the material properties of the composite and developing advanced individual components. However, barely substituting steel by carbon does not allow to fully utilise the carbon's benefits while its disadvantageous properties reveal the limits of this approach. Instead, novel design principles are required to meet the material's nature aiming at appropriately using its beneficial properties.Currently, new construction principles are being researched for high‐performance building material combinations such as textile and carbon reinforced concrete. This paper provides an overview of baselines in the preliminary stages of this research. The overview includes history, inspiration, concrete matrices, non‐metallic reinforcement, structural elements, modelling, production, tomography, and sustainability. The objective of the study is to provide a baseline for the envisaged development of principles for future construction: radically new concepts for the design, modelling, construction, manufacturing, and use of sustainable, resource‐efficient building elements made of mineral building materials with the aim of entirely benefiting from the materials’ potential.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

show abstract

What hampers innovation? External stakeholders, the organization, groups and individuals: a systematic review of empirical barrier research

Cited by 87 publications

References 153 publications

Overcoming Barriers to Successfully Commercializing Carbon Dioxide Utilization

Overcoming Barriers to Successfully Commercializing Carbon Dioxide Utilization

On the conceptualization and measurement of dynamic capabilities for sustainability: Building theory through a systematic literature review

New perspectives on carbon reinforced concrete structures—Why new composites need new design strategies

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About