2001
DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-5446.2001.00259.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What Happens When We Use Kohlberg? His Troubling Functionalism and the Potential of Pragmatism in Moral Education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notwithstanding the wide appreciation of CMD, and Kohlberg's own contention that it is applicable universally (Kohlberg, 1971), it has also been the target of considerable criticism. The criticisms are varied in nature, but include: its exclusively Western philosophical roots; its origins in interviews solely with young males; its dogmatic and deterministic assumption that there is a single, correct form of terminal ethical maturity -stage 6 reasoning; and its "overarching use of justice as a 'first principle' of moral development" (Henry, 2001), without accepting the legitimacy of alternative ethical perspectives such as utilitarianism, care, or altruism. Please see Fraedrich et al (1994) for a review of these criticisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Notwithstanding the wide appreciation of CMD, and Kohlberg's own contention that it is applicable universally (Kohlberg, 1971), it has also been the target of considerable criticism. The criticisms are varied in nature, but include: its exclusively Western philosophical roots; its origins in interviews solely with young males; its dogmatic and deterministic assumption that there is a single, correct form of terminal ethical maturity -stage 6 reasoning; and its "overarching use of justice as a 'first principle' of moral development" (Henry, 2001), without accepting the legitimacy of alternative ethical perspectives such as utilitarianism, care, or altruism. Please see Fraedrich et al (1994) for a review of these criticisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite criticisms, CMD theory remains widely used as a basis for research of ethical values, both within and beyond the North American context that informed its development (cf. Henry, 2001). It has also been used -inappropriately -as a basis for modelling behavioural intentions (Robin et al, 1996): Kohlberg never intended such a linkage (from reasoning to behavioural intention), believing that many other factors (e.g., knowledge, values, attitudes, important others, opportunities) would be involved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kohlberg's CMD model has been widely used in research examining the reasons individuals make moral judgments, but it has also been the subject of criticisms. Critics have argued that Kohlberg's stages of moral reasoning reflect fundamental western, male, and social-class biases (Dien, 1982;Gilligan, 1982;Henry, 2001). For example, Dien (1982) had serious concerns about using the model in China.…”
Section: Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Via Lakatosean methodology, not only is it possible to evaluate the development of theory on the basis of the accretion of empirical results, but also on the basis of comparing its coherence with that of other theories pretending to the same practical agenda. Henry (2001) has analysed the applicability of Kohlberg's theory to the social level. Henry argues that while seeing his developmental theory successfully applied to individual moral development, Kohlberg in the late 1960s turned his attention to the use of his theory in educational practice -to providing the best social arrangement for promoting the free exercise of participants' moral reasoning (Henry 2001:261).…”
Section: Critical Rationalism Appliedmentioning
confidence: 99%