2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10344-014-0882-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What has molecular epidemiology ever done for wildlife disease research? Past contributions and future directions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 125 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Historically, viral causes of disease in reptiles were likely to be under-reported for many reasons including the cost and bioinformatics support required to investigate novel diseases using NGS technologies, as well as co-infections with microbial species, and poor sampling techniques that obscure the true aetiologic agent [6]. Pathogen discovery tools, which are not reliant on targeting a specific organism, are increasingly being used in wildlife disease investigations [10,17,53,54], although uptake is considered slow comparative to health research in humans and domestic animals [54]. Thus we anticipate an increase in the number of viruses detected in wildlife taxa that have had few viral disease investigations, such as lizards, compared to well-studied mammals such as bats, rodents and primates where their capacity to host zoonotic pathogens arguably provides public health drivers for research as well as funding incentives [55,56].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historically, viral causes of disease in reptiles were likely to be under-reported for many reasons including the cost and bioinformatics support required to investigate novel diseases using NGS technologies, as well as co-infections with microbial species, and poor sampling techniques that obscure the true aetiologic agent [6]. Pathogen discovery tools, which are not reliant on targeting a specific organism, are increasingly being used in wildlife disease investigations [10,17,53,54], although uptake is considered slow comparative to health research in humans and domestic animals [54]. Thus we anticipate an increase in the number of viruses detected in wildlife taxa that have had few viral disease investigations, such as lizards, compared to well-studied mammals such as bats, rodents and primates where their capacity to host zoonotic pathogens arguably provides public health drivers for research as well as funding incentives [55,56].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While whole-genome sequencing (WGS) is increasingly being applied to human bacterial pathogens and is offering profound insight into their biology (21,22), few studies have utilized this approach for the study of bacterial infections in wildlife (23). Limited WGS data from passerine-derived S. Typhimurium isolates are available, and such information would offer considerable insight into the epidemiology and disease pathogenesis of these strains.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These PCR‐based methods require knowing which pathogens are likely present, but disease etiology is not always known. Merely detecting the presence of a pathogen is not sufficient for many wildlife disease studies, particularly for understanding epidemiological questions related to disease transmission, rate of infection, dispersal, and evolution (Benton et al ). The foundation for genetic comparison of pathogens is fairly simple: find mutations in conserved nucleotide sequences that can be used to determine how samples are related to each other.…”
Section: Pathogen Detection and Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%