Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2004. CVPR 2004.
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2004.1315243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What image information is important in silhouette-based gait recognition?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
118
0

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
118
0
Order By: Relevance
“…May 24, 2010 DRAFT a silhouette still contains information about the shape of human body that is vulnerable to changes caused by conditions such as clothing and carrying. Although recent studies suggest that static shape information is more important than kinematics for most of the silhouette-based gait recognition approaches [18], [19], including static appearance features in gait representation also makes the existing approaches vulnerable to the changes of covariate conditions. To overcome the problem, it is crucial to select the most relevant gait features that reflect the unique characteristics of gait as a behavioral biometric, and importantly are invariant to appearance variations caused by changes of covariate conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…May 24, 2010 DRAFT a silhouette still contains information about the shape of human body that is vulnerable to changes caused by conditions such as clothing and carrying. Although recent studies suggest that static shape information is more important than kinematics for most of the silhouette-based gait recognition approaches [18], [19], including static appearance features in gait representation also makes the existing approaches vulnerable to the changes of covariate conditions. To overcome the problem, it is crucial to select the most relevant gait features that reflect the unique characteristics of gait as a behavioral biometric, and importantly are invariant to appearance variations caused by changes of covariate conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We argue that the main reason for the poor performance is that the existing approaches rely on both static appearance features and dynamic gait features for person identification, i.e. the identification is not achieved using gait alone [18], [19]. More specifically, most existing approaches represent gait using features extracted from silhouettes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…it represents subject-dependent covariates. We used our own database as benchmark for convience, since we know its structure and good recognition results were reported using this database [11]. It is assumed that a new database will be recorded in similar or near conditions to the recording of the benchmark and the quality of images in the new database will be not much worse than in the benchmark.…”
Section: Number Of Samples Per Subjectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The widely used and compared databases on gait recognition include: the University of Maryland's surveillance data [10]; the University of South Florida's outdoor data [11]; Carnegie Mellon University's multiview indoor data [12]; and the University of Southampton's data [13]. The majority of methods and databases found in the literature thus concern a person walking in frontoparallel [6], [7], [9] or the use of several digital cameras acquiring the movement [7], [8] and thus the knowledge of the calibration parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, model-free approaches are mainly silhouette-based. The silhouette approaches [8], [9] characterize body movement by the statistics of the patterns produced by walking. These patterns capture both the static and dynamic properties of body shape.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%