What incentives increase data sharing in health and medical research? A systematic review

Abstract

BackgroundThe foundation of health and medical research is data. Data sharing facilitates the progress of research and strengthens science. Data sharing in research is widely discussed in the literature; however, there are seemingly no evidence-based incentives that promote data sharing.MethodsA systematic review (registration: 10.17605/OSF.IO/6PZ5E) of the health and medical research literature was used to uncover any evidence-based incentives, with pre- and post-empirical data that examined data sharing rates. We were also interested in quantifying and classifying the number of opinion pieces on the importance of incentives, the number observational studies that analysed data sharing rates and practices, and strategies aimed at increasing data sharing rates.ResultsOnly one incentive (using open data badges) has been tested in health and medical research that examined data sharing rates. The number of opinion pieces (n = 85) out-weighed the number of article-testing strategies (n = 76), and the number of observational studies exceeded them both (n = 106).ConclusionsGiven that data is the foundation of evidence-based health and medical research, it is paradoxical that there is only one evidence-based incentive to promote data sharing. More well-designed studies are needed in order to increase the currently low rates of data sharing.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s41073-017-0028-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Scientific impact and the quest for visibility

“…Or a system in which scientists are rewarded for having their work independently reproduced by other groups? I am not necessarily suggesting the adoption of a new metric, but I certainly find the idea of ‘Open Science’ badges appealing . Such badges would be consistent with the knowledge‐seeking logic of science, but will they also support the non‐epistemic quest for recognition?…”

Researcher Degrees of Freedom in the Psychology of Religion

“…Open Science practices among researchers include a lack of incentive and/or opportunity from the gatekeepers of scientific publishing such as journal and grant funding bodies (Allen & Mehler, 2018;Munafò et al, 2017 Offering badges has been shown to improve the adoption of Open Science practices (Kidwell et al, 2016;Rowhani-Farid, Allen, & Barnett, 2017 (Ladd, 2019).…”

Launch of the National Trauma Research Repository coincides with new data sharing requirements

“…Optimizing the research life cycle now involves responsible data stewardship, as opposed to ownership. The old paradigm—in which individual investigators maintain indefinite ownership of the data resulting from their publicly funded work—results in now unacceptable research waste, including hidden data and irreproducible findings 20. Single-instance use of research data and the inability to access data resulting from studies limit the impact of trauma research funding.…”