2016
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1520084113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What insects can tell us about the origins of consciousness

Abstract: How, why, and when consciousness evolved remain hotly debated topics. Addressing these issues requires considering the distribution of consciousness across the animal phylogenetic tree. Here we propose that at least one invertebrate clade, the insects, has a capacity for the most basic aspect of consciousness: subjective experience. In vertebrates the capacity for subjective experience is supported by integrated structures in the midbrain that create a neural simulation of the state of the mobile animal in spa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
183
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 263 publications
(193 citation statements)
references
References 141 publications
(178 reference statements)
2
183
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…One remaining dimension is to estimate and test the validity of this metric theoretical paradigm in birds and fishes, and even invertebrates. For instance, the recent proposal of consciousness in insects (Barron and Klein, 2016) requires a challenging evaluation of Phi in this invertebrate class.…”
Section: Boxmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…One remaining dimension is to estimate and test the validity of this metric theoretical paradigm in birds and fishes, and even invertebrates. For instance, the recent proposal of consciousness in insects (Barron and Klein, 2016) requires a challenging evaluation of Phi in this invertebrate class.…”
Section: Boxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The integrated picture is enriched because it gives a sense or content to the information; for example, it is not possible to experience visual shapes independently of their colour, or perceive the left half of the visual field independently to the right half (Tononi and Laureys, 2009; see Chapter 2). The integrated relevant information can be made accessible for detecting anomalies and errors, decision making, developing strategies, further planning, inferring the internal or motivation state of other animals and, at least in humans, setting long-term goals and strategies and rational thought (Barron and Klein, 2016;Koch and Tsuchiya, 2007;.…”
Section: Brain Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although few would doubt that most mammals are conscious, debates revolve around the possibility of fish, cephalopods, crustaceans or insects being conscious, and more specifically, feeling pain (Allen (2004); Edelman et al (2005); Edelman and Seth (2009);Elwood (2012); Godfrey-Smith (2017); Griffin (1976); Tye (2017)). The most central debate features proponents of consciousness in animals such as fish (Braithwaite (2010); Huntingford et al (2006); Jones (2013); Sneddon (2011)) and insects (Barron and Klein (2016)) versus opponents to the existence of consciousness in those animals (Derbyshire (2016); Rose (2007); Rose et al (2014); Key (2015Key ( , 2016; Key et al (2016)). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While some researchers have argued invertebrates are conscious (Elwood and Apel 2009;Merker 2007;Tye 2000;Crook, Hanlon and Walter 2013;Mather 2008;Klein and Barron 2016), have beliefs and desires (Tye 2000;Carruthers 2005), and that the humane treatment principle ought to be extended to invertebrates (Cooper 2011;Crook 2013; see also Fischer 2016), little attention has been paid to the ethics of painless killing. Does a painless death harm an invertebrate?…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%