2021
DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.2723
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What is agentic about the Spatial Agency Bias? How pragmatic relevance contributes to the spatial representations of actions

Abstract: The mental imagination of (social) actions has been shown to follow a left-to-right trajectory, with the thematic agent associated with the left position (Spatial Agency Bias, Suitner & Maass, 2016). For example, individuals asked to choose a picture that visualizes the sentence "Tom kicks George." tend to choose an image where the agent, Tom, is positioned on the left-hand side rather than on the righthand side. However, alternative to the thematic role of the agent, such findings may reflect a mental represe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Study 1, the defending space ship was placed about 50:50 on the left and right-hand side of the pictures which means that in line with our hypothesis the original SAB effect was considerably reduced and even eliminated. But with a more abstract operationalization in which possible further influences (such as the spatial relevance bias, Halicki et al, 2021 ) were removed, Study 2 showed a clear reversal. Although the spatial representation directed to the left was much weaker and less unequivocal than that of attack as directed to the right, these results nevertheless suggest that the spatial representations of defense and attack are located in different positions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In Study 1, the defending space ship was placed about 50:50 on the left and right-hand side of the pictures which means that in line with our hypothesis the original SAB effect was considerably reduced and even eliminated. But with a more abstract operationalization in which possible further influences (such as the spatial relevance bias, Halicki et al, 2021 ) were removed, Study 2 showed a clear reversal. Although the spatial representation directed to the left was much weaker and less unequivocal than that of attack as directed to the right, these results nevertheless suggest that the spatial representations of defense and attack are located in different positions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Apparently defense is spatially represented differently than attack. This is remarkable insofar as a mere relevance bias ( Halicki et al, 2021 ) would not have predicted any differences between the attack and defense scenes. According to the relevance bias, the defending ship in the defense condition and the attacking space ship in attack scenes should have been placed on the left.…”
Section: Studymentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Objects in lower visual field appears closer Ooi et al (2001) Lower versus upper visual field; Distance perception Distant (vs. near) objects are more associated with upper (vs. lower) visual field Previc (1990) Horizon placement in the top versus bottom third of a panoramic image; Abstract versus concrete construal mindset Placement of the horizon in the top (vs. bottom) third of a panoramic image primes a stronger abstract (vs. concrete) mindset Halicki, Ingendahl, et al, (2021) and Halicki, Suitner, et al (2021) Left versus right brain hemisphere; Processing of stimuli Left (right) hemisphere of the brain associated with visual (verbal) processing Kimura, 1961Kimura, , 1966 Left versus right brain hemisphere;…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%