What Is an International Cybersecurity Regime and How We Can Achieve It?

Stadnik, Ilona

doi:10.5817/mujlt2017-1-7

Cited by 6 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Penulis berpendapat bahwa ITU didirkan sebagai suatu organisasi internasional dibawah PBB yang terbentuk oleh karena kebutuhan negara dalam mempertahankan perdamaian dan kerjasama ICT. Namun, perlu diketahui bahwa model tatanan dari rezim siber yang tercipta baik ITU maupun diluar ITU didorong oleh dua faktor utama yaitu: kebutuhan para aktor untuk mempunyai platform pembuatan kebijakan bersama; dan menjadi sarana untuk para aktor yang memiliki kapabilitas dan kepentingan dalam kontrol pembuatan kebijakan yang ada untuk isu siber (Stadnik, 2017).…”

Section: Pendahuluanunclassified

“…Berlanjut mengenai dilema dalam keamanan siber, perlu memang secara umum penjagaan perdamaian dan keamanan global dilakukan oleh aktor negara dalam suatu rezim internasional (termasuk forum multilateral). Nmaun, untuk memaksimalkan preservasi perdamaian dan keamanan internasional dalam dimensi siber harus melibatkan industri IT dan aktor non-negara yang menggunakan teknologi sebagai jiwa mereka (Stadnik, 2017). Namun, peran multilateralisme masih penting disini karena norma yang terbentuk di level domestik mengalami difusi dalam level global melalui proses institusionalisasi yang terjadi (Finnemore & Sikkink, 1998).…”

Section: Hasil Dan Pembahasan 1 Tinjauan Historis Keamanan Siber Dalam Hubungan Internasionalunclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Politisasi Agenda Keamanan Siber Pada Era Industri 4.0 di Forum Multilateral

Jose

2021

POPULIKA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Keamanan siber dalam forum multilateral masih mengalami perdebatan dan tantangan hingga saat ini di tahun 2021. Forum multilateral selain menjadi sarana kerjasama bagi para negara untuk mencari solusi bersama juga menjadi ruang untuk para aktor mengedepankan politisasi kepentingan mereka dalam agenda multilateral. Isu strategis dan substantif dari keamanan siber hingga saat ini sudah meluas ke konflik geopolitik sehingga terjadi redefinisi dari alam keamanan siber itu sendiri yang berpengaruh ke forum multilateral. Artikel ini menggunakan penelitian kualitatif menggunakan data sekunder untuk menganalisa berbagai sub konteks yang relevan. Artikel ini akan membahas bagaimana politisasi keamanan siber dilakukan di forum multilateral pada era 4.0. Artikel ini juga membahas mengenai peran pemerintah yang diredefinisi oleh kebutuhan akan peran industri dan non-state actor dalam dinamika multilateral untuk agenda keamanan siber.

show abstract

Section: Pendahuluanunclassified

Section: Hasil Dan Pembahasan 1 Tinjauan Historis Keamanan Siber Dalam Hubungan Internasionalunclassified

Politisasi Agenda Keamanan Siber Pada Era Industri 4.0 di Forum Multilateral

Jose

2021

POPULIKA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…They also presume the current dialogue within the UN Open-ended Working Group on Developments in the Field of Information and Telecommunications in the Context of International Security (hereafter -the OEWG) shows that some states (including Russia, China, Venezuela) advocate the existence of legal vacuum with regard to the behavior of states in cyberspace (at least in certain areas). And they urge the international community to negotiate an appropriate international treaty for the field (Boothby, 2019;Stadnik, 2017).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

International Responsibility In Cyberspace: The Problems Of Attribution Of Conduct

Красиков¹

2022

European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Investigation and qualification of cyber incidents of a cross-border nature are complicated by difficulties to identify the device from which the attack was carried out, to establish the true place of the malicious activity, to identify specific responsible persons, and to assess their relationship with a State that may be involved in the cyberattack. This makes it problematic to attribute the harmful activity to such State for the purposes of international responsibility. Within the scholarly discussions, various options for overcoming these problems of attribution are proposed, among which two approaches are the most noticeable. One such option is to mitigate the attribution dilemma by laying stress on States' duty of due diligence. Another route is to elaborate a lex specialis "lightweight" test for attribution of non-State actors' conduct to States, namely the test of "control and capabilities". This paper contains the authors' comment on the ways proposed by scholars to overcome the problems of implementation of the international legal responsibility of States in cyberspace, generated by the difficulties of attribution of conduct. The authors advocate the view that the international obligation of due diligence and a more flexible control test for attribution may actually serve as a means of solving the attribution problems in cyberspace, but they are not without drawbacks, related to the nature of the proposed rules, their content, as well as their political effect, and these should be taken into account in the further discussion of ways out of the current situation of lack of effective tools.

show abstract

The Cyber Dialogue at the Crossroads: Why States Disagree on the Need for a New Cyber Treaty?

Красиков

Липкина

2021

SHS Web Conf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As evidenced by the preliminary results of work of the UN Open-ended Working Group on developments in the field of information and telecommunications in the context of international security, currently the states have different views towards legal regulation of cyberspace. A number of states (mostly Western) argue that the existing international law sufficiently addresses the relationships in the area, and they call on all interesting parties to express their views on how the law is applied, while other states, like Russia, China and Venezuela claim that there is a legal vacuum as to the regulation of cyberspace and propose starting to globally negotiate a new binding legal instrument. This paper explores the reasons for the states to insist on their views on the need for a new cyber treaty and demonstrates that the respective disagreement between states cannot be explained neither by a global interest in maintaining the state of legal uncertainty about the proper sources or rules, nor by the lack of choice of the parties to the debate regarding the tools to address such uncertainty. The authors argue that the explanation lies in the correlation between corresponding substantive and instrumental stances of both sides of the debate, since the states’ preferences regarding the appropriate rules can be more fully and effectively implemented within the respective instrumental solutions and such solutions provide their adherers with more tools to control the processes of their implementation.

show abstract

What Is an International Cybersecurity Regime and How We Can Achieve It?

Cited by 6 publications

References 16 publications

Politisasi Agenda Keamanan Siber Pada Era Industri 4.0 di Forum Multilateral

Politisasi Agenda Keamanan Siber Pada Era Industri 4.0 di Forum Multilateral

International Responsibility In Cyberspace: The Problems Of Attribution Of Conduct

The Cyber Dialogue at the Crossroads: Why States Disagree on the Need for a New Cyber Treaty?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About