2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.02.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What is appropriate and relevant assistance after a disaster? Accounting for culture(s) in the response to Typhoon Haiyan/Yolanda

Abstract: Typhoon Haiyan, known locally as Yolanda, was one of the strongest typhoons to hit the Philippines in recent history, killing over 6000 people when it made landfall in November 2013.The international humanitarian response was fast and expansive, with post-response evaluations noting it as largely successful. This study, however, reveals a disconnect between international humanitarian and affected-community understandings of effectiveness, and roots the division in an under-acknowledged difference of cultures b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be just as erroneous and hierarchical a knowledge form as the other domains of disaster management (Hilhorst 2003: 47). Rather, this is to recognise that local values and areas of knowledge 'shape the way that people define a disaster, the way they look for solutions, and what they even consider to be a disaster and a solution in the first place' (Field, 2017). It is in the mutual dialogue between domains -and the related contestation and negotiation of ideas, theories and approaches -that disaster governance evolves (Hilhorst, 2003), if not in always in response effectiveness and relevance, then at least in participation and ownership.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be just as erroneous and hierarchical a knowledge form as the other domains of disaster management (Hilhorst 2003: 47). Rather, this is to recognise that local values and areas of knowledge 'shape the way that people define a disaster, the way they look for solutions, and what they even consider to be a disaster and a solution in the first place' (Field, 2017). It is in the mutual dialogue between domains -and the related contestation and negotiation of ideas, theories and approaches -that disaster governance evolves (Hilhorst, 2003), if not in always in response effectiveness and relevance, then at least in participation and ownership.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Household responses echoed this phenomena and it was common for organizationally defined criteria for 'training' to be absent from local perspectives. As Field (2017) notes in the Philippines context, different cultures can often result in different understandings of effectiveness and even what constitutes programming. The lesson that should be taken from this finding is that there is a need to align training with the learner's perspective, not that of donor or organizational objectives.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is important, because without addressing the issue of norms, progress on more technical dimensions of rubble clearance are unlikely to result in improvements. As Field (: 342) argues, ‘there has to be a clearer consciousness of the values, norms and priorities that [international actors] bring’ to post‐disaster contexts. Furthermore, the focus on technical aspects of rubble clearance has served to highlight the perceived backwardness of Haiti and to further minimize the possible role of Haitian actors in disaster response.…”
Section: Post‐disaster Rubble Clearance: Context and Haitian Experiencementioning
confidence: 99%