2004
DOI: 10.1525/9780520931251
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What Is Cinema? Volume I

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0
8

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
49
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…During one shot, the slice of a bulldozer’s arm can create new sightlines, turning a wall into a window, a frame into a pile of rubble, or darkness into light. We might revisit André Bazin’s (1967: 35) now classic argument that one-shot sequences are more realistic because they cover whole scenes through a depth of field rather than through montage. The films of Costa and Guerín, in contrast, demonstrate how even during a single long take with a fixed camera, moving architecture acts on the cinematic image, changing its depth of field as if architectural movement itself were a film edit.…”
Section: Cutting Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…During one shot, the slice of a bulldozer’s arm can create new sightlines, turning a wall into a window, a frame into a pile of rubble, or darkness into light. We might revisit André Bazin’s (1967: 35) now classic argument that one-shot sequences are more realistic because they cover whole scenes through a depth of field rather than through montage. The films of Costa and Guerín, in contrast, demonstrate how even during a single long take with a fixed camera, moving architecture acts on the cinematic image, changing its depth of field as if architectural movement itself were a film edit.…”
Section: Cutting Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…So they're doing their natural thing but I'm moving my camera' (ibid.). Bazin (1971) argued that the long take is both more 'cinematic' than montage editing but also, in its exploration of temporal and spatial unities within a scene, underlines the perceived realism of a narrative. For Bazin, the edit compromises an event's unity, converting it from real to imaginary.…”
Section: The Choreography Of Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, other scholars dispute the applicability of Mulvey’s theory to porn texts, and some efforts have been made within porn studies to recuperate pornography from the male gaze, or suggest that it is sometimes precisely through pornography that this gaze can be subverted, and in which the plasticity of gendered subject positions is most clearly displayed (see, for example, Butler, 1997; Williams, 1989). Drawing on the work of Bazin, Williams (1989: 38) posits that the presentation in pornography of ‘real sex, like real death, is unaesthetic and therefore out of place’, since real erotic affect elicited in performers is ‘contradictory to the exigencies of art’ (Bazin, 1971: 173). Thus, the particularity of the male gaze that Mulvey asserts is inherent to any spectator–object relationship may seem misplaced where porn is concerned precisely because the aesthetic gaze she harnesses to mainstream Hollywood cinema is disrupted by the real in the context of porn.…”
Section: The Virility Of Authoritymentioning
confidence: 99%