What Is Consensus and How Is It Achieved in Meetings?

Haug, Christoph

doi:10.1017/cbo9781107589735.024

Cited by 25 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 57 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…These professional gatherings are held in various forms and provide a selective insight into multiple social orders that (co)exist in an organization or company. As already shown by others, the specific meeting and negotiation culture of multilateral organizations (Bendix 2013;Fresia 2013;Thedvall 2012) and institutions (Schwartzman 1993;1989;, corporations (Nyqvist 2015), networks or movements (Graeber 2009;Haug 2015) is indicative of the organizational culture.…”

Section: Negotiating Formal Power and Scale: Seating Arrangements And...mentioning

confidence: 76%

Privileged Precarities

Mülli¹

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Wie gestalten sich die Arbeits- und Lebenswelten von jungen UNO-Beschäftigten in Zeiten des Postfordismus? Ausgehend von der Perspektive junger Beschäftigter an den UNO-Standorten in Genf und Wien befasst sich das Buch mit der zunehmenden Flexibilisierung und Arbeitsplatzunsicherheit. Die Studie legt ein besonderes Augenmerk auf mikrostrukturelle Machtpraktiken und die individuelle Agency. Sie zeigt, wie UNO-Beschäftigte ihre persönlichen Erzählungen mit dem in den vergangenen Jahren und Jahrzehnten kreierten Organisationsbild in Einklang bringen, und in welchem Wechselspiel die prekären Beschäftigungsverhältnisse mit einem moralischen Überlegenheitsgefühl stehen. Dabei wird deutlich, dass diese Entwicklungen keinen Widerspruch darstellen, sondern zwei Seiten derselben Medaille sind. Das Buch zeigt am Beispiel der UNO auf, wie flexible Beschäftigungsverhältnisse in Zeiten des kognitiv- und affektbasierten Kapitalismus auf Biographien wirken. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

show abstract

Section: Negotiating Formal Power and Scale: Seating Arrangements And...mentioning

confidence: 76%

Privileged Precarities

Mülli¹

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Some of these criticisms include questioning the validity and reliability of the methodology; others criticize particular aspects of the method. One of the more fundamental critiques concerns the question of what some scholars called "imposed consent" (Haug, 2015). From this regard, the Delphi is criticized because it does not provide a space for important discussions and debates and provides no opportunity to discuss and resolve differences of opinion but rather bypasses disagreement by assuming it does not exist (Woudenberg, 1991).…”

Section: The Methods -Benefits and Limitations: The Delphi Techniquementioning

confidence: 99%

The use of Delphi and Nominal Group Technique in nursing education: A review

Foth

Efstathiou

Vanderspank‐Wright

et al. 2016

International Journal of Nursing Studies

150

129

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…We aimed to establish a deliberative consensus (Haug, 2015) rather than a unanimous agreement on outcomes. Accordingly, though a wide range of stakeholders influenced the MSCOS, everyone agreed that the views of survivors should be centered.…”

Section: Consensus Processmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…To prioritize the views of survivors and follow the principles of epistemic and actional deference (Pearlman & Elizabeth, 2022), we aimed to create a deliberative consensus (Haug, 2015) in which survivors' views were centered and weighted more heavily. Although we ensured that a broad range of stakeholders had the opportunity to contribute and influence the development of the MSCOS, we believe that it is both morally and epistemically necessarily to "believe the testimony of people about 'harms that relate to their [marginalised] identity'" (Pearlman & Elizabeth, 2022).…”

Section: Finding Purpose In Life and Selfactualizationmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Modern Slavery Core Outcome Set: A Survivor-Driven Consensus on Priority Outcomes for Recovery, Wellbeing, and Reintegration

Jannesari,

Damara,

Witkin

et al. 2023

Trauma, Violence, & Abuse

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There is no consensus on the outcomes needed for the recovery and reintegration of survivors of modern slavery and human trafficking. We developed the Modern Slavery Core Outcome Set (MSCOS) to address this gap. We conducted three English-language reviews on the intervention outcomes sought or experienced by adult survivors: a qualitative systematic review (4 databases, 18 eligible papers, thematic analysis), a rapid review of quantitative intervention studies (four databases, eight eligible papers, content analysis) and a gray literature review (2 databases, 21 websites, a call for evidence, 13 eligible papers, content analysis). We further extracted outcomes from 36 pre-existing interview transcripts with survivors, and seven interviews with survivors from underrepresented groups. We narrowed down outcomes via a consensus process involving: a three-stage E-Delphi survey (191 respondents); and a final consensus workshop (46 participants). We generated 398 outcomes from our 3 reviews, and 843 outcomes from interviews. By removing conceptual and literal duplicates, we reduced this to a longlist of 72 outcomes spanning 10 different domains. The E-Delphi produced a 14-outcome shortlist for the consensus workshop, where 7 final outcomes were chosen. Final outcomes were: “long-term consistent support,” “secure and suitable housing,” “safety from any trafficker or other abuser,” “access to medical treatment,” “finding purpose in life and self-actualisation,” “access to education,” and “compassionate, trauma-informed services.” The MSCOS provides outcomes that are accepted by a wide range of stakeholders and that should be measured in intervention evaluation.

show abstract

What Is Consensus and How Is It Achieved in Meetings?

Cited by 25 publications

References 57 publications

Privileged Precarities

Privileged Precarities

The use of Delphi and Nominal Group Technique in nursing education: A review

The Modern Slavery Core Outcome Set: A Survivor-Driven Consensus on Priority Outcomes for Recovery, Wellbeing, and Reintegration

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About