2020
DOI: 10.1159/000511185
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What Is Gratitude? Ingratitude Provides the Answer

Abstract: Current scholarship on “gratitude” has largely ignored its opposite – ingratitude. As a result, gratitude is no longer distinguishable from constructs such as appreciation and happiness. This was not the case over previous centuries – ingratitude was viewed as something monstrous, a failure to reciprocate would loosen the bonds holding society together. The opposite, gratitude, was seen as a virtue. Reciprocity has come under attack because “obligation” has been understood in only one of two possible senses. T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, they showed no grasp of the favorable implications of displaying gratitude, namely that the grateful recipient should be evaluated more positively, is more likely to reciprocate, and is a preferable cooperative partner (i.e., should receive more resources). We tentatively propose that perhaps by age 4, children (at least in this particular population) have come to view gratitude expressions as normative and commonplace and thus perceive their absence to be noteworthy and diagnostic but not yet their presence (see Baumeister et al, 2001; Vaish et al, 2008; see also Navarro & Tudge, 2020). Our findings suggest that about a year later, children also robustly grasp the positive information conveyed by gratitude displays.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…However, they showed no grasp of the favorable implications of displaying gratitude, namely that the grateful recipient should be evaluated more positively, is more likely to reciprocate, and is a preferable cooperative partner (i.e., should receive more resources). We tentatively propose that perhaps by age 4, children (at least in this particular population) have come to view gratitude expressions as normative and commonplace and thus perceive their absence to be noteworthy and diagnostic but not yet their presence (see Baumeister et al, 2001; Vaish et al, 2008; see also Navarro & Tudge, 2020). Our findings suggest that about a year later, children also robustly grasp the positive information conveyed by gratitude displays.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…This has some limits. First, gratitude experience appears to be more complex than just feelings of gratitude, considering the behavioral component of gratitude [ 40 ] or the willingness to reciprocate as the crucial point of gratitude being understood as a moral virtue [ 41 ]. Second, discrepancies between the theoretical and operational definitions of gratitude can be noticed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, discrepancies between the theoretical and operational definitions of gratitude can be noticed. While the theoretical definition focused on a triadic conceptualization (i.e., including a benefit, a benefactor, and a beneficiary), half of the GQ-6 items assessed dyadic gratitude (i.e., including a beneficiary and a benefit) [ 41 , 42 ]. So, if the GQ-6 has become the most widely used instrument of measure to study gratitude, we have to be aware of its limits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The more people perceive a gift as good, unobligated, and costly, the more gratitude they feel . In contrast, people high in entitlement may tend to overlook the contributions of others or view positive acts as obligations rather than gifts (Navarro & Tudge, 2020). Thus, low humility often may lead to ingratitude, which then undermines trust and cooperation (Emmons, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%