2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2109.08882
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What is Important? Morphological Asymmetries are Useful Predictors of Star Formation Rates of Star-forming Galaxies in SDSS Stripe 82

Hassen M. Yesuf,
Luis C. Ho,
S. M. Faber

Abstract: Morphology and structure of galaxies reflect their star formation and assembly histories. We use the framework of mutual information (MI) to quantify interdependence among several structural variables and to rank them according to their relevance for predicting specific star formation rate (SSFR) by comparing the MI of the predictor variables with SSFR and penalizing variables that are redundant. We apply this framework to study ∼ 3, 700 face-on star-forming galaxies (SFGs) with varying degrees of bulge domina… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 172 publications
(275 reference statements)
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although not the main focus of this study, we briefly mention, for completeness, the relation between morphological asymmetry and star formation, as it pertains to the distribution of SFGs on the galaxy main sequence (e.g., Daddi et al 2007;Elbaz et al 2007;Noeske et al 2007). It is evident from Figure 12 that the average level of asymmetry (A outer ) increases mildly but systematically above the main sequence, echoing the recent findings of Yesuf et al (2021). Consistent with previous work (e.g., Cibinel et al 2019), major merger candidates (Section 4.2) stand out the most, but it is notable that a significant fraction of major merger candidates also lie on and below the main sequence (Figure 12b).…”
Section: Relation With Star Formationsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Although not the main focus of this study, we briefly mention, for completeness, the relation between morphological asymmetry and star formation, as it pertains to the distribution of SFGs on the galaxy main sequence (e.g., Daddi et al 2007;Elbaz et al 2007;Noeske et al 2007). It is evident from Figure 12 that the average level of asymmetry (A outer ) increases mildly but systematically above the main sequence, echoing the recent findings of Yesuf et al (2021). Consistent with previous work (e.g., Cibinel et al 2019), major merger candidates (Section 4.2) stand out the most, but it is notable that a significant fraction of major merger candidates also lie on and below the main sequence (Figure 12b).…”
Section: Relation With Star Formationsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Thus, the only variable for this test is the amount of resolved morphology. This makes us conclude that galaxy morphology carries much information about galaxy properties, not only in a global sense for total stellar mass but also as a resolved map-like feature (see also Yesuf et al 2021, for the importance of morphology in predicting galaxy SFR).…”
Section: Evaluating the ML Prediction As A Function Of Image Sizementioning
confidence: 64%
“…Meanwhile, the control sample predominantly exhibits more "normal" morphologies, but also includes irregular and asymmetric morphologies which may be driven by environment, secular evolution, or more minor interactions with 𝜇 < 0.1 (e.g. Richter & Sancisi 1994;Rix & Zaritsky 1995;Swaters et al 1999;Jog & Combes 2009;Zaritsky et al 2013;Martin et al 2018;Yesuf et al matching control was extracted. The mean growth factor was 𝑁 grow = 1.77.…”
Section: Post-merger and Control Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%