Administrative burden on citizens who receive various forms of social and financial support from governments is a growing area of interest and concern for scholars of public policy and administration (Carey et al., 2021;Döring, 2021;Herd & Moynihan, 2019). Scholars are concerned with how excessive or cumbersome administrative burdens and processes are being used strategically as 'policy making by other means' (Herd & Moynihan, 2019). Moreover, these burdens tend to be inequitably distributed, thereby entrenching existing social inequalities (Carey et al., 2021;Chudnovsky & Peeters, 2021;Herd & Moynihan, 2019). This paper examines the experiences of women with disability, who are a marginalised group (UN Secretary-General, 2017), navigating the Australian National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS). It explores what these experiences tell us about administrative burdens and their construction within the NDIS and, in turn, personalisation schemes more broadly as they relate to women.Previous research has indicated that administrative burdens may be particularly high in personalisation schemes such as the NDIS, because these schemes are predicated on very high levels of selfadvocacy (Carey et al., 2019;Glendinning et al., 2008;Needham & Glasby, 2015). Within the personalisation model, which is growing internationally (Needham & Glasby, 2015), individuals must articulate their goals and needs to street level bureaucrats . The more successful they are at articulating these needs in a way that aligns with 'the system' or bureaucrats' worldview, the more likely they are able to receive larger or better-tailored plans (Carey et al., 2021). For example, Mavromaras et al. (2018) found that people with advocates received larger plans within the