Objective: Despite the well-known negative impacts of cancer and anticancer therapies on cognitive performance, little is known about the cognitive compensatory processes of older patients with cancer. This study was designed to investigate the cognitive compensatory processes of older, clinically fit patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing chemotherapy.
Methods:We assessed 89 consecutive patients (age ≥ 65 y) without severe cognitive impairment and 89 age-, sex-, and education level-matched healthy controls. Cognitive compensatory processes were investigated by (1) comparing cognitive performance of patients and healthy controls in novel (first exposure to cognitive tasks) and non-novel (second exposure to the same cognitive tasks) contexts, and (2) assessing psychological factors that may facilitate or inhibit cognitive performance, such as motivation, psychological distress, and perceived cognitive performance. We assessed cognitive performance with theTrail-Making, Digit Span and FCSR-IR tests, psychological distress with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and perceived cognitive performance with the FACT-Cog questionnaire.Results: In novel and non-novel contexts, average cognitive performances of healthy controls were higher than those of patients and were associated with motivation. Cognitive performance of patients was not associated with investigated psychological factors in the novel context but was associated with motivation and psychological distress in the non-novel context.
Conclusions:Older, clinically fit patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing chemotherapy demonstrated lower cognitive compensatory processes compared to healthy controls.Reducing distress and increasing motivation may improve cognitive compensatory processes of patients in non-novel contexts. resources and strategies to perform a task. Clinically, these processes could be reflected, for example, in a feeling of not being able to function as before, a need to increase mental effort for a well-known task, and difficulties to benefit from previous experience.Although currently impossible to study directly, cognitive compensatory processes can be assessed indirectly through neuroimaging or longitudinal studies comparing cognitive performance of patients and healthy controls. In longitudinal studies, these processes should be studied by assessing the cognitive performance of older cancer patients in novel and non-novel contexts and by assessing psychological factors that may facilitate or inhibit cognitive performance.Cognitive performance in novel versus non-novel contexts may require different levels of compensatory processes. In a novel context, optimal performance requires memory skills to memorize instructions, as well as executive skills (eg, planning, inhibition, and elaboration strategies) to achieve a goal and reduce interference caused by the novel context itself.In a non-novel context, optimal performance requires the ability to remember and use previously acquired information through spec...