2022
DOI: 10.1515/ijsl-2021-0016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What is “Language Making”?

Abstract: This article introduces a new concept called “Language Making”. The term covers all kinds of processes in which speakers or non-speakers collectively conceptualize linguistic entities. Such processes are usually perpetual, they operate based on language ideologies and attitudes, and they bring about functional and structural norms which determine the boundaries of linguistic entities such as languages, dialects or varieties. The article discusses the significance of standardization, language policy and plannin… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The combination of pre-existing (primarily North Hamgyŏng) Korean dialect constellations on the ground, ideologically motivated orthographic choices that (coincidentally) reinforced salient dialect differences, Soviet korenizatsiia (indigenization) policies, and the workings of the Piedmont Principle (Soviet Koreans as a shining beacon for their oppressed brethren across the border in Japanese-occupied Korea), conspired to launch a new variety of 'Soviet' Korean called Koryŏmal or Koryŏŏ -thanks in large part to local bottom-up initiatives on the part of Soviet Korean intellectuals -along a pathway to emerging as a new Korean "Nebensprache", "Ausbausprache" and/or distinct Korean "Kultur"-dialect or Korean "langue collatérale". Krämer et al (2022) have recently described an emergent field of sociolinguistics and the sociology of language that they call "Language Making, " and which they define (ibid. : 3) as "conscious or unconscious human processes in which imagined linguistic units are constructed and perceived as a language, a dialect or a variety. "…”
Section: How Planned Was Soviet Korean?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combination of pre-existing (primarily North Hamgyŏng) Korean dialect constellations on the ground, ideologically motivated orthographic choices that (coincidentally) reinforced salient dialect differences, Soviet korenizatsiia (indigenization) policies, and the workings of the Piedmont Principle (Soviet Koreans as a shining beacon for their oppressed brethren across the border in Japanese-occupied Korea), conspired to launch a new variety of 'Soviet' Korean called Koryŏmal or Koryŏŏ -thanks in large part to local bottom-up initiatives on the part of Soviet Korean intellectuals -along a pathway to emerging as a new Korean "Nebensprache", "Ausbausprache" and/or distinct Korean "Kultur"-dialect or Korean "langue collatérale". Krämer et al (2022) have recently described an emergent field of sociolinguistics and the sociology of language that they call "Language Making, " and which they define (ibid. : 3) as "conscious or unconscious human processes in which imagined linguistic units are constructed and perceived as a language, a dialect or a variety. "…”
Section: How Planned Was Soviet Korean?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The videos, therefore, highlight groups that are important for the speaker; they represent different categorizations and provide more or less detailed descriptions of each group. The name for a specific accent shows а process of 'making language' (Krämer et al 2022) or 'language labelling' (Pennycook, Otsuji 2015).…”
Section: Grassroots Level Of Performative Use Of Non-native Accentsmentioning
confidence: 99%