2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-31235-4_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What Is Listening Comprehension and What Does It Take to Improve Listening Comprehension?

Abstract: One's ability to listen and comprehend spoken language of multiple utterances and oral texts (i.e., listening comprehension) is one of the necessary component skills in reading and writing development. In this chapter, we review theoretical frameworks and empirical evidence of listening comprehension development and improvement. A review of correlational and intervention studies indicates that many language and cognitive skills contribute to listening comprehension, including working memory, attention, vocabul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0
5

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
35
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, one way scholars have pushed on the original SVR framework is by investigating theoretical and empirical expansions of the SVR that include contributions of additional variables to reading comprehension beyond the original components (D and LC), such as background knowledge (Cromley & Azevedo, 2007; see also Kintsch, 2004), text characteristics (Francis, Kulesz, & Benoit, 2018), reading fluency (Tilstra, McMaster, van den Broek, Kendeou, & Rapp, 2009), and executive functions (EFs), both domain‐general (Locascio, Mahone, Eason, & Cutting, 2010) and reading‐specific (Cartwright, Lee, et al, 2020). Other expansions of the SVR have focused on unpacking the LC construct (Kieffer, Petscher, Proctor, & Silverman, 2016; Kim & Pilcher, 2016; LARRC, 2017), taking into account its multidimensionality and significance (e.g., Cervetti et al, 2020) by exploring the specific contributions of variables, such as inference making, perspective taking, and background knowledge to reading comprehension through LC (Kim, 2017, 2020).…”
Section: Svr: Its Simplicity Masks Complexity In Advancing the Science Of Readingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, one way scholars have pushed on the original SVR framework is by investigating theoretical and empirical expansions of the SVR that include contributions of additional variables to reading comprehension beyond the original components (D and LC), such as background knowledge (Cromley & Azevedo, 2007; see also Kintsch, 2004), text characteristics (Francis, Kulesz, & Benoit, 2018), reading fluency (Tilstra, McMaster, van den Broek, Kendeou, & Rapp, 2009), and executive functions (EFs), both domain‐general (Locascio, Mahone, Eason, & Cutting, 2010) and reading‐specific (Cartwright, Lee, et al, 2020). Other expansions of the SVR have focused on unpacking the LC construct (Kieffer, Petscher, Proctor, & Silverman, 2016; Kim & Pilcher, 2016; LARRC, 2017), taking into account its multidimensionality and significance (e.g., Cervetti et al, 2020) by exploring the specific contributions of variables, such as inference making, perspective taking, and background knowledge to reading comprehension through LC (Kim, 2017, 2020).…”
Section: Svr: Its Simplicity Masks Complexity In Advancing the Science Of Readingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Listening comprehension refers to the ability to comprehend spoken language verbalized in utterances (Kim and Pilcher, 2016). We draw from studies on English, an opaque orthography, where listening comprehension and oral language skills have been more widely studied.…”
Section: Multicomponential Approach For Assessing Reading and Readingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They make the acquisition of certain skills harder for L2 learners and require more intensive instruction over longer periods of time. Due to its complex nature and to the broad range of skills required for its mastery, discourse comprehension can be considered a large problem space (Kim & Pilcher, 2016) that inherently tends to inhibit interdependence. What the interdependence continuum hypothesis implies for sentence comprehension is not immediately clear.…”
Section: The Interdependence Continuum Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%