1996
DOI: 10.1007/s002689900174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What Is New in the Prophylaxis and Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism?

Abstract: Deep venous thrombosis continues to be a frequent complication of surgery and trauma. The topic is controversial with regard to diagnosis, indication for prophylaxis, and suitable methods for prophylaxis and therapy. We review some of the highlights of the extensive literature in this field during the last few years. Particular emphasis is given to new trends in diagnostic methods, newly discovered genetic factors for thrombophilia, and the use of heparins for prophylaxis and therapy of thromboembolic disease.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 66 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite improvements in technique and experience gained in clinical microvascular surgery, small vessel thrombosis after operative procedures remains a considerable uncertainty in vascular and reconstructive surgery, even in the hands of the most technically experienced physicians. [1][2][3][4] To prevent the manifestation of thrombosis, a variety of anticoagulation and antiplatelet aggregation agents have been introduced into clinical practice, [5][6][7] but a definitive choice for the most effective prophylaxis has not yet been determined.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite improvements in technique and experience gained in clinical microvascular surgery, small vessel thrombosis after operative procedures remains a considerable uncertainty in vascular and reconstructive surgery, even in the hands of the most technically experienced physicians. [1][2][3][4] To prevent the manifestation of thrombosis, a variety of anticoagulation and antiplatelet aggregation agents have been introduced into clinical practice, [5][6][7] but a definitive choice for the most effective prophylaxis has not yet been determined.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%