2006
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0742-597x(2006)22:1(35)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What Is Preproject Planning, Anyway?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
55
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
5
55
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Phase II, the Concept Scope, or "select alternative" as per the IDEF0 model, is the focus of this paper. This phase in particular is important for the pre-project planning process, whereby 80% of the project outcome can be specified through basic design documents, guiding project success at later life cycle phases (detailed design, construction, and startup) (Gibson et al 2006 andThyssen et al 2010). Similarly, this phase is expected to be the most influential for eco-city projects since it encompasses critical activities related to the incorporation of sustainability requirements into the Concept MP.…”
Section: Pre-project Planning Process For New Eco-citymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phase II, the Concept Scope, or "select alternative" as per the IDEF0 model, is the focus of this paper. This phase in particular is important for the pre-project planning process, whereby 80% of the project outcome can be specified through basic design documents, guiding project success at later life cycle phases (detailed design, construction, and startup) (Gibson et al 2006 andThyssen et al 2010). Similarly, this phase is expected to be the most influential for eco-city projects since it encompasses critical activities related to the incorporation of sustainability requirements into the Concept MP.…”
Section: Pre-project Planning Process For New Eco-citymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reduce the increase in cost and time a connection between efforts spent on planning and the economic performance of the project is found (Gibson Jr. et al 2006). The economic benefit by proactive planning is found to have an average profit margin of 23%, where projects with reactive planning have an average project margin of -3% (Hanna et al 2010;Hwang et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hanna and Skiffington (2010) argued that expanded construction arrangement enables the temporary worker to be more proactive than receptive with respect to basic elements that influence a venture. As per Gibson et al (2006), strategic planning of project could lead to enhanced project result, more prominent client fulfilment, and decreased venture cost and term. Therefore, distinguishing and testing for noteworthy contrasts in the effects of the basic achievement figures with respect to time, cost, and quality are crucial in managing these elements in preextend arrangement as an approach to secure the best project result.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%