2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00134-014-3534-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What is “severe burnout” and can its prevalence be assessed?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Depression has both reliable diagnostic criteria and highly effective treatment options in contrast to burnout [ 55 , 56 ]. Therefore, our findings lend considerable support to the proposal that depression scales with clinically valid cutoffs should be used as complements to burnout questionnaires when clinically assessing burnout [ 54 ]. Interestingly, the HBI_sum decreased with the grade of major depression in MD .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Depression has both reliable diagnostic criteria and highly effective treatment options in contrast to burnout [ 55 , 56 ]. Therefore, our findings lend considerable support to the proposal that depression scales with clinically valid cutoffs should be used as complements to burnout questionnaires when clinically assessing burnout [ 54 ]. Interestingly, the HBI_sum decreased with the grade of major depression in MD .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Similar to the Finnish “Health 2000 study”, about half of those with severe burnout were affected by major depression [ 29 ]. Without valid cut-offs for severe (clinically relevant) burnout, Bianchi suggests using conservative cut-offs for studies on the overlap of severe burnout and depression [ 23 , 54 ]. Given Bianchis’ finding, that only 3% of the participants in his study of French teachers met the inclusion criteria for severe burnout by using a conservative cut-off [ 33 ], we decided to investigate the odds for major depression in the 3% of our participants with the highest HBI_sum.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 It should be noted that the criteria used for identifying "cases" of burnout have not only been arbitrary. They have also shown considerable heterogeneity from one study to another (Bianchi 2015;Doulougeri et al 2016), thereby jeopardizing between-study comparability. All in all, it must be acknowledged that the research dedicated to estimating the prevalence of burnout has been conspicuous by its vacuity.…”
Section: The Unresolved Problem Of Burnout Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is debate regarding the clinical validity of cut‐off points for grading the severity of this condition using the normatively referenced Maslach Burnout Inventory‐Human Services Survey . The MBI‐HSS tool was developed for research rather than clinical use and critical thresholds for high burnout are not well established . Despite this caveat, the limited evidence to date suggests that Australian and New Zealand radiation oncology trainees are at risk of burnout .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 The MBI-HSS tool was developed for research rather than clinical use and critical thresholds for high burnout are not well established. 5 Despite this caveat, the limited evidence to date suggests that Australian and New Zealand radiation oncology trainees are at risk of burnout. 1 Therefore, understanding and describing strategies with potential to prevent burnout and optimise motivation are essential when considering the health, well-being, retention and productivity of radiation oncology trainees.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%