2001
DOI: 10.1080/01419870120063954
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What is Spanish nationalism today? From legitimacy crisis to unfulfilled renovation (1975–2000)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This dynamic is sometimes cited as evidence of increasing support for the Spanish state. It is interpreted as a manifestation of a developing civil or shared identity (Martínez-Herrera, 2002, p. 423; Muro & Quiroga, 2005, p. 24), or as evidence of the decline of exclusivist nationalisms in favor of a multinationalism or pluralism that recognizes other identities but continues to locate sovereignty in the overarching Spanish nation (Balfour & Quiroga, 2007, p. 75; Llera, 2009, p. 326; Núñez, 2001, p. 734). Almost all analyses to date share the perspective adopted by Beramendi and Máiz (2004), who argue that devolution may be considered successful “as long as we observe a robust association between the development of the EA [ Estado de las Autonomías , or State of the Autonomies], the expansion of dual identities, and the shrinking of exclusive ones” (p. 138).…”
Section: Relevance Of Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This dynamic is sometimes cited as evidence of increasing support for the Spanish state. It is interpreted as a manifestation of a developing civil or shared identity (Martínez-Herrera, 2002, p. 423; Muro & Quiroga, 2005, p. 24), or as evidence of the decline of exclusivist nationalisms in favor of a multinationalism or pluralism that recognizes other identities but continues to locate sovereignty in the overarching Spanish nation (Balfour & Quiroga, 2007, p. 75; Llera, 2009, p. 326; Núñez, 2001, p. 734). Almost all analyses to date share the perspective adopted by Beramendi and Máiz (2004), who argue that devolution may be considered successful “as long as we observe a robust association between the development of the EA [ Estado de las Autonomías , or State of the Autonomies], the expansion of dual identities, and the shrinking of exclusive ones” (p. 138).…”
Section: Relevance Of Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It fit the multi‐ethnic atmosphere of the transition period and the classical stereotype of the Basques. Furthermore, the long authoritarian regime had thoroughly discredited and de‐legitimised Spanish nationalism as a political discourse (Núñez 2001a: 722–4). New democratic politicians rejected its confrontational narratives (conservatives and Catholics versus liberals and secularists), along with the project of a centralist State.…”
Section: The National Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholars of the transition have recently begun to question or complicate the historical narrative of this process, advocating a multi-factor model of transition (Radcliff 2011) and focusing on the continuing tensions between substate nationalist movements and Spanish nationalism (Núñez 2001;Núñez Seixas 2000. A further destabilizing factor during the transition was the proliferation of low-level terrorist groups through the Spanish periphery, most notably the long-running and highly-publicized armed conflict in Euskadi (the Basque Country).…”
Section: Introduction -The Spanish Transition and Political Violence mentioning
confidence: 99%