2017
DOI: 10.1063/1.4984617
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What is special about how roaming chemical reactions traverse their potential surfaces? Differences in geodesic paths between roaming and non-roaming events

Abstract: With the notable exception of some illustrative two-degree-of-freedom models whose surprising classical dynamics has been worked out in detail, theories of roaming have largely bypassed the issue of when and why the counterintuitive phenomenon of roaming occurs. We propose that a useful way to begin to address these issues is to look for the geodesic (most efficient) pathways through the potential surfaces of candidate systems. Although roaming manifests itself in an unusual behavior at asymptotic geometries, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They observed that the onset of roaming occurs on the hundreds of femtoseconds (rather than the nanoseconds time scale as commonly assumed), and both the onset and duration of roaming are in a strongly stochastic character. This observation seems in line with the conclusion drawn from an earlier theoretical approach based on the geodesic paths (not classical trajectories) approach . That theoretical study scrutinized the onset of the paths that will eventually roam and suggested that their stochastic character in the early stage sets the destination.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They observed that the onset of roaming occurs on the hundreds of femtoseconds (rather than the nanoseconds time scale as commonly assumed), and both the onset and duration of roaming are in a strongly stochastic character. This observation seems in line with the conclusion drawn from an earlier theoretical approach based on the geodesic paths (not classical trajectories) approach . That theoretical study scrutinized the onset of the paths that will eventually roam and suggested that their stochastic character in the early stage sets the destination.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This observation seems in line with the conclusion drawn from an earlier theoretical approach based on the geodesic paths (not classical trajectories) approach. 63 That theoretical study scrutinized the onset of the paths that will eventually roam and suggested that their stochastic character in the early stage sets the destination. Then, what are the deciding factors, if any, that guide the trajectory toward the roaming region or to follow the tight TS path?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A promising theoretical approach based on the geodesic paths (not classical trajectories) has recently been formulated and applied to the formaldehyde benchmark. 41 That study scrutinized the onset of the paths that will eventually roam and suggested that their stochastic character in the early stage sets the destination. A nonlinear dynamics theory from the phase space perspective, albeit with reduced dimensionality, has also been developed to frame and to analyze the roaming phenomenon and dynamical characteristics.…”
Section: Implications and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several dissociation mechanisms such as McLafferty rearrangements 32 and two‐step fragmentations were found and discussed. We also found pathways involving roaming hydrogen atoms, 33,34 an unconventional fragmentation mechanism that bypasses the typical saddle point transition state 35 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%