2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What is students' ideal university instructor personality? An investigation of absolute and relative personality preferences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Longitudinal studies have found that individuals change in their level of personality and the most personality trait change occurs during young adulthood (Roberts et al 2006 ). Thus, students may be looking for and most benefit from people who are similar to them at different stages of their lives, as a match between student and teacher personality can be beneficial for student educational experiences (Kim and MacCann 2016 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Longitudinal studies have found that individuals change in their level of personality and the most personality trait change occurs during young adulthood (Roberts et al 2006 ). Thus, students may be looking for and most benefit from people who are similar to them at different stages of their lives, as a match between student and teacher personality can be beneficial for student educational experiences (Kim and MacCann 2016 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FFM describes differences in people's personality in terms of their positions on five broad dimensions of Openness to experience, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness and Neuroticism, also called Emotional Stability, captured by the acronym OCEAN (for a review: see John, Naumann, & Soto, 2008). Multiple studies have shown that students' preferred or most liked teachers are perceived as similar to themselves on different personality characteristics (Chamorro-Premuzic, Furnham, Christopher, Garwood, & Martin, 2008;Furnham & Chamorro-Premuzic, 2005;Kim & MacCann, 2016;Tan, Mansi, & Furnham, 2017). For example, university students' self-reports on Conscientiousness, Openness to Experience, Agreeableness and Extraversion positively predicted their preferred teachers' personality descriptions on the corresponding domains in the socially desirable direction, even more than demographic variables like age or gender (Chamorro-Premuzic et al, 2008;Furnham & Chamorro-Premuzic, 2005;Tan et al, 2017).…”
Section: Personality Similarity Between Teachers and Studentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instructor characteristic bias may also influence SET responses. Instructor personalities that are outgoing and engaging have positively correlated with SET results (Clayson, 2013;Kim & MacCann, 2016), and instructor physical attractiveness has also positively correlated with evaluations on ratemyprofessor.com (Felton, Mitchell, & Stinson, 2004). Instructor title seems to have affected ratings that resulted in sessional lecturers obtaining higher ratings than full-time faculty (J.…”
Section: Potential Biases Affecting Responsesmentioning
confidence: 99%