2016
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b00154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What Is the Best Method to Fit Time-Resolved Data? A Comparison of the Residual Minimization and the Maximum Likelihood Techniques As Applied to Experimental Time-Correlated, Single-Photon Counting Data

Abstract: The need for measuring fluorescence lifetimes of species in subdiffraction-limited volumes in, for example, stimulated emission depletion (STED) microscopy, entails the dual challenge of probing a small number of fluorophores and fitting the concomitant sparse data set to the appropriate excited-state decay function. This need has stimulated a further investigation into the relative merits of two fitting techniques commonly referred to as "residual minimization" (RM) and "maximum likelihood" (ML). Fluorescence… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
47
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As above, the fluorescence decay curves recorded for BAB(H) could be analysed satisfactorily in terms of mono‐exponential fits in non‐polar (i.e., ϵ s <8) solvents. However, with increasing solvent polarity the quality of the exponential fit was seen to worsen; this judgement was based on the reduced chi‐squared parameters ( χ 2 in Table ) and the randomness of the weighted residuals. Furthermore, the radiative rate constant ( k rad = Φ F / τ S ) adopts a strong dependence on solvent polarity that does not seem justified .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As above, the fluorescence decay curves recorded for BAB(H) could be analysed satisfactorily in terms of mono‐exponential fits in non‐polar (i.e., ϵ s <8) solvents. However, with increasing solvent polarity the quality of the exponential fit was seen to worsen; this judgement was based on the reduced chi‐squared parameters ( χ 2 in Table ) and the randomness of the weighted residuals. Furthermore, the radiative rate constant ( k rad = Φ F / τ S ) adopts a strong dependence on solvent polarity that does not seem justified .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Full information on the categories and mathematical treatment is available in Supporting Information, with results shown in Figure S3. [71] The results of the ON-OFF fitting are shown in Figure 3, and the fit parameters are listed in Table S1. The CsPbBr 3 , CsPbI 3 , and CsPbI 3 -MeOAc nanocrystals were on for 87 %, 97 %, and 99 % of the total analysis time, respectively.…”
Section: Articlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5][6] Typically, in a TCSPC experiment, a fluorescence lifetime is determined by acquiring a histogram of arrival time differences between an excitation pulse and the pulse resulting from a detected photon. As we have noted, 3,4 when a histogram of sufficient quality cannot be obtained to provide a good fit by means of minimizing the residuals (RM) between the experimental data and a given functional form, the maximum likelihood (ML) technique is particularly effective, namely when the total number of counts is very low. 3 As we have shown in the case of rose bengal, ML retrieved the correct mean lifetime to within 2% of the accepted value with total counts as low as 20; and it retrieved the correct mean lifetime with less than 10% standard deviation with total counts as low as 200.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%