2017
DOI: 10.1063/1.4997171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What is the best planar cavity for maximizing coherent exciton-photon coupling

Abstract: We compare alternative planar cavity structures for strong exciton-photon coupling, where the conventional distributed Bragg reflector (DBR) and three unconventional types of cavity mirrors -air/GaAs DBR, Tamm-plasmon mirror and sub-wavelength grating mirror. We design and optimize the planar cavities built with each type of mirror at one side or both sides for maximum vacuum field strength. We discuss the trade-off between performance and fabrication difficulty for each cavity structure. We show that cavities… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, in applications relating to strong light−matter coupling and VSC in particular, DBR's often yield a lower Rabi splitting compared to metallic mirrors. 26 Metal mirrors such as Au by virtue of their large extinction coefficient generate microcavities with better optical confine- ment of the electromagnetic fields and therefore larger Rabi splitting. On the other hand, their lower reflectivity compared to the DBRs leads to lower Q microcavities and higher rates of polariton dephasing.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, in applications relating to strong light−matter coupling and VSC in particular, DBR's often yield a lower Rabi splitting compared to metallic mirrors. 26 Metal mirrors such as Au by virtue of their large extinction coefficient generate microcavities with better optical confine- ment of the electromagnetic fields and therefore larger Rabi splitting. On the other hand, their lower reflectivity compared to the DBRs leads to lower Q microcavities and higher rates of polariton dephasing.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, DBRs poorly confine light, with light penetrating usually much more than λ/2 into the mirror structure, depending on refractive-index contrast. Hence, in applications relating to strong light–matter coupling and VSC in particular, DBR’s often yield a lower Rabi splitting compared to metallic mirrors …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[20] Due to the strong field confinement of TPPs, it would also be a suitable structure for investigating the effect of Rabi splitting as well as the performance of strong coupling. [21][22][23][24][25][26] Under strong coupling conditions, TPP and excitons will form a new quasi-particle-Tamm plasmon excitonpolariton. Compared with excitons, its equivalent mass is smaller, so it is easier to form Bose-Einstein condensation than excitons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%