2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.03.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What is the clinical benefit of preoperative chemoradiotherapy with 5FU/leucovorin for T3-4 rectal cancer in a pooled analysis of EORTC 22921 and FFCD 9203 trials: Surrogacy in question?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
51
1
5

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
51
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the eligibility of poor-risk rectal cancer is the most important limitation, because there are no previous studies of neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone for patients with poor-risk rectal cancer, and we cannot compare the efficacy and feasibility. It has been mentioned that a short-term outcome such as the pCR rate or local relapse rate does not qualify as a surrogate for overall survival in patients treated by preoperative FU/RT (40). Although this study showed that neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone is effective in some patients with poor-risk rectal cancer from the viewpoint of short-term outcome, it is essential to develop predictive markers of response.…”
Section: Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy For Rectal Cancermentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Moreover, the eligibility of poor-risk rectal cancer is the most important limitation, because there are no previous studies of neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone for patients with poor-risk rectal cancer, and we cannot compare the efficacy and feasibility. It has been mentioned that a short-term outcome such as the pCR rate or local relapse rate does not qualify as a surrogate for overall survival in patients treated by preoperative FU/RT (40). Although this study showed that neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone is effective in some patients with poor-risk rectal cancer from the viewpoint of short-term outcome, it is essential to develop predictive markers of response.…”
Section: Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy For Rectal Cancermentioning
confidence: 98%
“…El coeficiente de concordancia de la RP es similar al encontrado en otros estudios que han empleado una categorización diferente de la RP 9 . El valor pronóstico de la RP no logra superar la fortaleza de la etapificación definitiva luego de RQT en esta serie, hecho que tiene defensores 9 y retractores 4 , lo que amerita mayor estudio 13,14 .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Collectively, these studies indicate that the number of patients with good response to CRT may be optimized by escalating the radiation dose to the tumour. It is worth noting, though, that pCR does not work well as a surrogate endpoint for evaluation of pre-operative treatment strategies [21][22][23], i.e. increased rates of pCR do not appear to translate into clinical benefit for patients who subsequently undergo surgery.…”
Section: Rationale For Dose-escalationmentioning
confidence: 98%