2015
DOI: 10.1002/lary.25379
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What is the evidence for postoperative lumbar drains in endoscopic repair of CSF leaks?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There have been several other reviews that dealt with LD placement for the management of CSF leaks; however, these studies were not as comprehensive and included patients treated for idiopathic and/or traumatic CSF leaks. 19,24,32,33 We chose to use stringent inclusion criteria because postoperative outcomes from EEA skull base reconstruction are substantially different from other types of CSF leaks because they more frequently result in large dural defects and high-flow CSF leaks [34][35][36][37] Results of a number of studies indicated that these types of leaks may be more amenable to vascularized tissue repair. 17,[38][39][40] As such, we only reported on contemporary repair techniques, specifically, pedicled flap and/or multilayered reconstructions, to permit a more-focused analysis that is generalizable and relevant to current skull base practices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There have been several other reviews that dealt with LD placement for the management of CSF leaks; however, these studies were not as comprehensive and included patients treated for idiopathic and/or traumatic CSF leaks. 19,24,32,33 We chose to use stringent inclusion criteria because postoperative outcomes from EEA skull base reconstruction are substantially different from other types of CSF leaks because they more frequently result in large dural defects and high-flow CSF leaks [34][35][36][37] Results of a number of studies indicated that these types of leaks may be more amenable to vascularized tissue repair. 17,[38][39][40] As such, we only reported on contemporary repair techniques, specifically, pedicled flap and/or multilayered reconstructions, to permit a more-focused analysis that is generalizable and relevant to current skull base practices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[19][20][21] In addition, there is growing evidence that shows a lack of benefit in LDs with respect to CSF leak repair secondary to iatrogenic, traumatic, or idiopathic causes. [22][23][24] Given these evolving factors, we aimed to evaluate the literature to determine the utility of CSF diversion in endoscopic skull base surgery with respect to postoperative CSF leak rates when using modern reconstructive techniques. Specifically, we aimed to address defects created as part of tumor resection of the anterior skull base.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bakhsheshian et al found that several studies evaluating LD in the endoscopic endonasal repair of CSF leaks indicated no clear benefit of LD. 5 However, they made no mention of the size or location of the defects and none of these studies were randomized. A recent review of LD usage in endoscopic skull base surgery concluded that there is much variation regarding LD and there is no definitive protocol.…”
Section: Anteriormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the lack of significance for suprasellar defects is consistent with the majority of the literature, consisting of nonrandomized series, largely composed of sellar or suprasellar tumors that did not demonstrate a need for LD. 1,5,8,13,24 Dural defect size was measured intraoperatively in 106 patients but was not routinely performed early in our series. We found a strong trend toward significance between size and leak rate (p = 0.03).…”
Section: Anteriormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acute symptomatic hydrocephalus in SAH 12 Spinal cord-protective strategy in open and endovascular thoracic aortic repair for patients at high risk of spinal cord injury 9,24,[38][39][40] Active CSF leak (due to craniofacial trauma) 41 or those at risk for CSF leak during skull base procedures [42][43][44] ; however, lumbar drains do not prevent postoperative CSF leaks 44,45 Facilitate intraoperative brain relaxation 27 and intraoperative exposure 46 CSF indicates cerebrospinal fluid; CT, computed tomography; GCS, Glasgow Coma Score; ICH, intracerebral hemorrhage; IVH, intraventricular hemorrhage; rTPA, recombinant tissue plasminogen activator; SAH, subarachnoid hemorrhage; SBP, systolic blood pressure; TBI, traumatic brain injury.…”
Section: Lumbar Drainsmentioning
confidence: 99%