2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.12.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What is the evidence for EUS-guided celiac plexus block/neurolysis?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 3 shows the VAS score and MS Contin controlledrelease tablet (Mundipharma Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd, Beijing, People's Republic of China) consumption before and after seed implantation. Before treatment, the mean VAS score was 5.78 (range [4][5][6][7][8], and all patients received MS Contin; the mean consumption of this drug was 68.26 mg (range 40-90 mg). Immediately after the procedure, no patient reported pain relief.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table 3 shows the VAS score and MS Contin controlledrelease tablet (Mundipharma Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd, Beijing, People's Republic of China) consumption before and after seed implantation. Before treatment, the mean VAS score was 5.78 (range [4][5][6][7][8], and all patients received MS Contin; the mean consumption of this drug was 68.26 mg (range 40-90 mg). Immediately after the procedure, no patient reported pain relief.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although CPN is considered safe, it provides limited benefit in terms of degree and duration of pain relief; the greater the extent of invasion of the celiac ganglia is, the less the analgesic effect achieved by CPN is. [2][3][4][5] Such limited efficacy may be at least partially attributed, until recently, to the lack of an imaging technique for the celiac ganglia, affecting the accuracy of the neurolytic agent delivery. The recognition that the celiac ganglia can be visualized and accessed by EUS allows the direct injection of neurolytic agents into individual celiac ganglia.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CPN is the preferred therapy in patients with cancerrelated pain. 73 A meta-analysis by Kaufman et al 74 of 5 studies including 199 patients found that EUS-CPN was effective in alleviating abdominal pain in 72% of patients. A double-blind, controlled trial found that early EUS-CPN reduces pain and may moderate morphine consumption in patients with newly diagnosed, painful, inoperable pancreatic cancer.…”
Section: Bmentioning
confidence: 99%