2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.03.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What is the hardware removal rate after anteroinferior plating of the clavicle? A retrospective cohort study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…26 Several authors have suggested to positioning the clavicle plate anteroinferior in order to reduce implant related complications. 7,12,17,27 Although the scientific evidence suggests that an anteroinferior position could be associated with a decreasing incidence of symptomatic hardware, it is associated with a more extensive muscle dissection and most available plates are designed for a superior position. 17 The renewed interest in midshaft clavicular fracture fixation has led to several anatomical studies that have focused on how current plates fit the clavicle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 Several authors have suggested to positioning the clavicle plate anteroinferior in order to reduce implant related complications. 7,12,17,27 Although the scientific evidence suggests that an anteroinferior position could be associated with a decreasing incidence of symptomatic hardware, it is associated with a more extensive muscle dissection and most available plates are designed for a superior position. 17 The renewed interest in midshaft clavicular fracture fixation has led to several anatomical studies that have focused on how current plates fit the clavicle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Baltes et al . looked in detail at the influence of plate positioning on hardware removal rate but could not conclude that it leads to reduced implant removal rates 27 . From an anatomical point of view our results support a superior plating position as this would lead to a less extensive muscle dissection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Superior plating is the most commonly used technique, but anterior-inferior plating, anterior plating or double plating with mini-fragment plates are described as well. 62 - 64 A biomechanical study comparing anterior and superior plate placement showed that, for all fracture patterns, more construct stiffness was achieved in axial compression and with a superior plate, whereas more construct stiffness was achieved in cantilever bending with an anterior plate. 65 Antero-inferior plating of midshaft clavicle fractures results in lower hardware removal due to plate prominence.…”
Section: Orif Using Plates and Screwsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…65 Antero-inferior plating of midshaft clavicle fractures results in lower hardware removal due to plate prominence. 62 , 66 It was found that anterior-inferior plating reduces the time to union, but the location of the plate does not seem to influence functional outcomes or infection rates. 63 …”
Section: Orif Using Plates and Screwsmentioning
confidence: 99%