2017
DOI: 10.1002/prop.201700011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What is the magnetic Weak Gravity Conjecture for axions?

Abstract: The electric Weak Gravity Conjecture demands that axions with large decay constant f couple to light instantons. The resulting large instantonic corrections pose problems for natural inflation. We explore an alternative argument based on the magnetic Weak Gravity Conjecture for axions, which we try to make more precise. Roughly speaking, it demands that the minimally charged string coupled to the dual 2‐form‐field exists in the effective theory. Most naively, such large‐f strings curve space too much to exist … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…in agreement with the magnetic version of the Weak Gravity Conjecture for axions [17,67] (see also [68]), with an intriguing extra factor of ρ. In this sense, one may interpret √ T D1…”
Section: Tensionless Stringssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…in agreement with the magnetic version of the Weak Gravity Conjecture for axions [17,67] (see also [68]), with an intriguing extra factor of ρ. In this sense, one may interpret √ T D1…”
Section: Tensionless Stringssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The magnetic Weak Gravity Conjecture should also have an analogous statement for axions. This was studied in []. In [], based on results in [], it was proposed that for an axion with decay constant f , there is a bound on the cutoff of the effective theory Λf which takes the form normalΛffMp.There are some subtleties with this proposal, in particular the axion in question here should be an axion such that its associated string should have a singular core.…”
Section: Charting the Swamplandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is only the mildest form of the conjecture. There are several more refined and constraining versions, such as a version applying to axions and other p-form fields, the Convex Hull Condition [47], Lattice and Tower WGC [48, 49], scalar versions of the conjecture [50-53] (leading to a connection to the Distance Conjecture and emergence [54-57]), and a variant leading to the instability of nonsupersymmetric AdS space [58, 59] (and to proposed constraints on the Standard Model [60-63]).Variants of the WGC have also been argued to constrain axion models of inflation or relaxation [48,58,[64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82][83]. The vanishing photon mass prediction mentioned above involves the WGC as well.All of this makes the WGC one of the most interesting Swampland constraints, but why should it be true?…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%