2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2005.08.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What Is the Optimal Clinical Technique for Measurement of Left Ventricular Volume After Myocardial Infarction? A Comparative Study of 3-Dimensional Echocardiography, Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography, and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

5
39
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
5
39
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The correlation coefficients between MPS and CMR for LV volumes and EF were similar between Segment and the four other MPS software packages, and in line with results reported in earlier studies [10][11][12][13]16,[14][15][17][18][19]. In the current study the EDV and ESV were underestimated by MPS, as compared to CMR, when using QGS, MyoMetrix, ECTb and Exini.…”
Section: Comparison Between Mps Software Packagessupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The correlation coefficients between MPS and CMR for LV volumes and EF were similar between Segment and the four other MPS software packages, and in line with results reported in earlier studies [10][11][12][13]16,[14][15][17][18][19]. In the current study the EDV and ESV were underestimated by MPS, as compared to CMR, when using QGS, MyoMetrix, ECTb and Exini.…”
Section: Comparison Between Mps Software Packagessupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In the current study the EDV and ESV were underestimated by MPS, as compared to CMR, when using QGS, MyoMetrix, ECTb and Exini. This underestimation has been observed in previous studies, with the same magnitude [12][13] or with a lower magnitude [11,10,15]. The lower magnitude of the underestimation may be explained by older turbo gradient echo CMR sequences in those studies compared to the current standard SSFP imaging that was used in the current study.…”
Section: Comparison Between Mps Software Packagessupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, to date, quantitative assessment of LV remodeling has been predominantly described in terms of changes in LV volume and ejection fraction, while disregarding the simultaneously occurring changes in ventricular shape. While a variety of techniques for quantitative evaluation of LV volume have become part of standard clinical practice [1][2][3], the development of tools for quantitative evaluation of ventricular shape has been explored only partially [4][5][6][7]. This is despite several studies indicating that LV shape analysis may be potentially useful and could be used in conjunction with different imaging modalities, including radionuclide ventriculography [8,9], electron beam computed tomography [10] and ultrasound images [11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the value of ECG-gated SPECT in assessing myocardial perfusion is well established, there are fewer data on the accuracy of ECG-gated SPECT for estimating left ventricular(LV) volumes and ejection fraction (EF) particularly in patients with severe and multiple perfusion defects caused by ischemic cardiomyopathy (Lim et al, 2006;Ioannidis et al, 2002;Chan et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%