2021
DOI: 10.21037/jtd-21-649
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What is the optimal timing to perform surgical stabilization of rib fractures?

Abstract: The practice of surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) for severe chest wall injury has exponentially increased over the last decade due to improved outcomes as compared to nonoperative management. However, regarding in-hospital outcomes, the ideal time from injury to SSRF remains a matter of debate. This review aims to evaluate and summarize currently available literature related to timing of SSRF. Nine studies on the effect of time to SSRF were identified. All were retrospective comparative studies w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
1
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We performed SSRF in our patients a median of 5 days post-injury. This could have impacted on outcomes, as early SSRF (within 3 days of admission) has been associated with shorter hospital and intensive length of stay, shorter duration of mechanical ventilation, and lower rates of pneumonia and tracheostomy [ 17 ]. Although we aim to perform SSRF as soon as practical, logistical constraints often delay progress to operative intervention and we have not improved on this over the 12 years of this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We performed SSRF in our patients a median of 5 days post-injury. This could have impacted on outcomes, as early SSRF (within 3 days of admission) has been associated with shorter hospital and intensive length of stay, shorter duration of mechanical ventilation, and lower rates of pneumonia and tracheostomy [ 17 ]. Although we aim to perform SSRF as soon as practical, logistical constraints often delay progress to operative intervention and we have not improved on this over the 12 years of this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first review article discussing early vs. late SSRF was published by Radomski and Pieracci in 2019, stating that an early SSRF within 72 h should be achieved but was only based on three publications at this point of time ( 31 ). Prins et al as well concentrated their review on the time point of SSRF and were able to recommend early SSRF within 48 or 72 h the latest based on the total number of nine publications concerning this matter ( 32 ). In our matched-pairs analysis, we were able to confirm these results by determining the significant beneficial effects of early SSRF, resulting in a shorter ICU stay and a shorter length of stay (LOS) in the hospital and additionally a trend to a shorter time on mechanical ventilation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On admission to the ICU, median ISS and SAPS II were 32 [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43] and 24 [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] respectively. After total body-CTscan; the median number of rib fractures was 7 [6][7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Lesions Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%