2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.07.1711
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What is the preferred GnRH analogue for polycystic ovary syndrome patients undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be explained by better quality embryos in agonist group. This agrees with the work of Orvieto et al 30 On the contrary, a study done by Al-Inany et al (28 RCTs involving 5014 women) compared GnRH agonist and GnRH antagonist showed that there was no significant difference in pregnancy rate between the two regimens. 32 The difference between this study and the current study may be due to the different antagonist protocols used and different patient characteristics (PCOS and poor responders).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This may be explained by better quality embryos in agonist group. This agrees with the work of Orvieto et al 30 On the contrary, a study done by Al-Inany et al (28 RCTs involving 5014 women) compared GnRH agonist and GnRH antagonist showed that there was no significant difference in pregnancy rate between the two regimens. 32 The difference between this study and the current study may be due to the different antagonist protocols used and different patient characteristics (PCOS and poor responders).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…30 In contrast, Singh et al demonstrated that there was no significant difference in the estrogen level in hCG day. 29 This difference may be due to small number of cases in antagonist group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In addition, no difference in serum RBP4 levels was observed between ovulatory and anovulatory PCOS patients (Carmina et al 2009). In PCOS patients who underwent controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for an IVF-embryo transfer, serum RBP4 was found to be significantly decreased during the process (Orvieto et al 2010). But there is no correlation between serum RBP4 levels and IVF treatment variables or outcome.…”
Section: Retinol Binding Protein-4mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The chronic anovulation and infertility is often successfully treated in PCOS; however, resultant successful pregnancy rates are lower than expected (33,34). Recurrent miscarriage is also common in women with PCOS (18)(19)(20).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The population consisted of 42 women with normal ovarian function undergoing IVF-ET due to their husbands suffering from azoospermia. The mean age was 27.5±2.8 years (range, [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34], and mean BMI was 19.11±1.12 kg/m 2 (range, 16.01-23.58). They had regular menstrual cycle lengths between 25-35 days.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%