2005
DOI: 10.1080/03075070500043176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What is the role for ICT‐based assessment in universities?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
50
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, to facilitate student understanding and foster a student's sense of responsibility for their learning, it was seen as beneficial that our formative assessment provides informative and supportive feedback, rather than just a grade, and does so in a timely manner to optimise learning outcomes. [16,17] We cannot definitively state that the higher results obtained by eQuip users compared with the results of those who did not use the program were because more conscientious students made use of the system and whether they would have obtained such results without the program. However, the distribution curves of the grades for students who used the system and those who did not indicate that there was an even distribution of strong and weak students.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Furthermore, to facilitate student understanding and foster a student's sense of responsibility for their learning, it was seen as beneficial that our formative assessment provides informative and supportive feedback, rather than just a grade, and does so in a timely manner to optimise learning outcomes. [16,17] We cannot definitively state that the higher results obtained by eQuip users compared with the results of those who did not use the program were because more conscientious students made use of the system and whether they would have obtained such results without the program. However, the distribution curves of the grades for students who used the system and those who did not indicate that there was an even distribution of strong and weak students.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Using technology to publish feedback Sending tutors' comments electronically (Bloxham and Boyd 2007;Crossouard and Pryor 2009;Denton 2001aDenton , 2001bDenton , 2003Denton et al 2008;Gipps 2005;Irons 2008) is an effective and simple means of communicating formative feedback to students, and can enhance the way in which students receive and engage with feedback. This may be feedback on an individual or group piece of work, or feedback generic to an entire student cohort on a module.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite their formative nature, the results of these tests may contribute towards a summative grade, and are therefore initially made available as a single attempt to generate the grade, and subsequently made openly available at the end of the module to aid revision. The use of commercial software products can deliver detailed formative feedback for each individual question, or specifically tailored to a particular response, more efficiently than is possible with traditional assessment (Brown, Bull, and Race 1999;Bull and McKenna 2004;Gipps 2005), and students favour the immediacy of such feedback as it keeps the activity and result closely connected, meaningful and current (Charman 1999;Denton et al 2008). Peat and Franklin (2002) describe the development of various online computer-based assessment components (including the use of weekly quizzes, mock examinations and self-assessment modules) and how students respond to these changes, while Hornby (2005) discusses the efficiencies afforded by the use of automated computer assessment in allowing students to take control of their learning and self-assess.…”
Section: Computer-assisted Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A survey of the literature examining the use of technology as a feedback mechanism offers strong support for the assertion that technology can be effective at engaging students in a process of productive learning [15][16][17][18][19][20]. It is noted that students view electronic feedback as superior; a Mann-Whitney analysis of the satisfaction ratings point to four ways that the feedback was improved by electronic delivery.…”
Section: Computer-mediated Feedback Deliverymentioning
confidence: 99%