2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.07.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What is the role of online support from the perspective of facilitators of face-to-face support groups? A multi-method study of the use of breast cancer online communities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
64
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
64
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…To enable reliable and useful annotation of topics, we established a coding schema of discussion topics through a literature review of information needs in online health communities, with an emphasis on breast cancer communities (Meier et al, 2007b; Civan and Pratt, 2007; Blank et al, 2010; Skeels et al, 2010; Wen et al, 2011; Bender et al, 2013; Kim et al, 2013). Our objectives were (i) to devise a coding scheme that is both relevant to describing the information needs of community members as well as applicable to and robust enough for automatic topic classification; and (ii) to design a coding scheme that can be applied to characterizing topics of discussion for either an entire post or its individual sentences.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To enable reliable and useful annotation of topics, we established a coding schema of discussion topics through a literature review of information needs in online health communities, with an emphasis on breast cancer communities (Meier et al, 2007b; Civan and Pratt, 2007; Blank et al, 2010; Skeels et al, 2010; Wen et al, 2011; Bender et al, 2013; Kim et al, 2013). Our objectives were (i) to devise a coding scheme that is both relevant to describing the information needs of community members as well as applicable to and robust enough for automatic topic classification; and (ii) to design a coding scheme that can be applied to characterizing topics of discussion for either an entire post or its individual sentences.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By gathering knowledge from institutional or medical websites, women become able to establish a new relationship with healthcare professionals and health systems. Despite the problem of trustworthiness, as pointed out in other studies [27,28]. there has been an increase in the number of people reading and writing blogs on the breast cancer experience.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Studies most often focused on breast cancer (n = 22; 31.9%),8,10,12,13,16,17,22,25,26,2830,35,4143,45,58,60,66,74,75 and prostate cancer (n = 4; 5.8%). 36,56,67,76 Other cancers mentioned were osteosarcoma, 73 rhabdomyosarcoma, 55 testicular, 11 skin, 23 cervical, 37,53,59,65 ovarian, 21, lung, 34 and colorectal.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other descriptive studies (n = 12; 17.4%; Table 2) used surveys, 11,23,24,28,40,43,46,59,60,63,65,74 in-depth interviews, 47 focus groups, 48 social network analyses, 20,68 a mix of measurement techniques, 8,9,13,22,30,39 Web metrics, 72,73 and frequencies 62 to describe how users employed social media to obtain and receive cancer information. It is important to note that only 1 of these studies reviewed the accuracy of information posted on a social media site (YouTube); it reported that roughly 75% of all videos had either fair or poor information about prostate cancer screening.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%