2016
DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2016.12.99
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What is the role of empirical treatment for suspected invasive candidiasis in non-neutropenic non transplanted patients in the intensive care unit?—Empiricus strikes back!

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Surveillance cultures are crucial, since a minimum contact period of 4 h with an infected patient or a contaminated surface may be enough for the acquisition of C. auris 4 . Furthermore, colonisation with Candida species is a well‐known risk factor for developing invasive candidiasis 6 and empirical antifungal therapy should be considered whether this is suspected 7 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Surveillance cultures are crucial, since a minimum contact period of 4 h with an infected patient or a contaminated surface may be enough for the acquisition of C. auris 4 . Furthermore, colonisation with Candida species is a well‐known risk factor for developing invasive candidiasis 6 and empirical antifungal therapy should be considered whether this is suspected 7 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Furthermore, colonisation with Candida species is a well-known risk factor for developing invasive candidiasis 6 and empirical antifungal therapy should be considered whether this is suspected. 7 Reliable and rapid laboratory methods for the detection of C. auris, both in clinical and surveillance samples, are also essential.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…documented. [42][43][44] From the data in Figure 2, a reduction in the consumption of caspofungin was observed over the period, with an increase in the consumption of micafungin. Although there are differences in terms of in vitro antifungal activities, toxicity profile and pharmacokinetics, the relevance of these distinctions between drugs is minimal.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%