2015
DOI: 10.1080/19392397.2015.1095644
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What is the self in the celebrity selfie? Celebrification, phatic communication and performativity

Abstract: The aim of this article is to outline celebrity selfies as a photographic genre and means of self-expression within celebrity culture. In the theoretical framework, we approach celebrity selfies on three distinct levels. First, the article elaborates on the concept of celebrification in order to set the cultural context for celebrity selfies. The second section discusses the phatic communicative function performed by celebrity selfies on social network sites to establish presence and keep fans updated and conn… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
47
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Research on selfies is prodigious with previous studies examining selfie-taking by teenagers (Dobson, 2015;Marwick, 2015), the use of selfies among elite user groups (eg. politicians, see Abidin, 2017; celebrities see Jerslev and Mortensen, 2016), life cycle selfies (eg. selfies at funerals, see Gibbs, Meese, Arnold, Nansen and Carter, 2015;Leaver and Highfield, 2015; and selfietaking while sick or injured, see Tembeck, 2016), dating apps and the reshaping of perceptions of intimacy (David and Cambre, 2016) and the performance of citizenship through selfie-taking (Kuntsman, 2017).…”
Section: Selfies and Diy Politicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on selfies is prodigious with previous studies examining selfie-taking by teenagers (Dobson, 2015;Marwick, 2015), the use of selfies among elite user groups (eg. politicians, see Abidin, 2017; celebrities see Jerslev and Mortensen, 2016), life cycle selfies (eg. selfies at funerals, see Gibbs, Meese, Arnold, Nansen and Carter, 2015;Leaver and Highfield, 2015; and selfietaking while sick or injured, see Tembeck, 2016), dating apps and the reshaping of perceptions of intimacy (David and Cambre, 2016) and the performance of citizenship through selfie-taking (Kuntsman, 2017).…”
Section: Selfies and Diy Politicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of the selfie as performative practice draws on sociological accounts of linguistic self-presentation, by Goffman (Hess ,2015) and Austin (Jerslev and Mortensen, 2015) and on semiotic approaches to aesthetics (Koffman et al, 2015;Iqani & Schroeder, 2016) so as to foreground three dimensions of digital self-representation. The first focuses on the selfreflexivity involved in the public staging of the private self; this dimension draws attention to the civic, political and cultural potentialities of 'vernaculars of performativity' in social media (Papacharissi, 2011), approaching them as 'cultures of connectivity' -sites of individuation, bonding and memory rather than simply as 'networks ' (van Djik, 2013).…”
Section: Aesthetic and Socio-technical Approaches To The Selfiementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, a new digital media culture is referred to as phatic, a culture dominated not by informational intent, but by social intent (Miller, 2008). Similarly, a mode of photo sharing where photographs are shared mainly to nurture and to confirm social relationships is becoming more common (Sandbye, 2012; Villi, 2012), and the concept of phatic is increasingly used when reporting research related to visual communication, current photo sharing practices and social media (Bayer et al, 2016; Jerslev and Mortensen, 2016; Kofoed and Larsen, 2016). In phatic photo sharing, neither the content of the photographs, their visual qualities nor the verbal stories about those photographs are seen as the key features of sharing; rather, the communicative significance, the pleasure of communication and the visual connectivity are focal (Lobinger, 2016: 481).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%