What justice and for whom? A political ecology of voice study into ‘senses of justice’ in Peru's Loreto Region

Abstract

This article explores community-based organisation and non-governmental organisation ‘senses of justice’ and their interaction with community procedural environmental justice claims. The research was centred on a study of Peru’s Loreto Region and the pollution impacts from oil extraction. This was conducted through the political ecology of voice theoretical framework which can act as a bridge between the fields of environmental justice and political ecology. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with eight relevant non-governmental organisations and four community-based organisations operating in Loreto, alongside testimony from other stakeholders. Results show that sense of justice synergies can occur between non-state actors and local communities, achieved through inclusive participatory mechanisms and equitable partnerships. This synergy enables local struggles to be made visible to the wider world as well as heard, evidenced through the grievances being addressed by the state and resource extraction industries. Nevertheless, how transformative these partnerships are is variable, with procedural legal justice offering the most beneficial way for community-based organisations and non-governmental organisations to support local justice struggles. Moreover, to be truly a transformative process, there is a need for these legal justice partnerships to challenge the deeper structural injustice of misrecognition so that human rights, alternative livelihoods and developmental futures are recognised and safeguarded.

Political ecology III: Praxis - doing, undoing, and being in radical political ecology research

“…Policy intervention may be at local, state, and international scales. For instance, Dale (2021) Eriksen et al, 2021;Fletcher, 2019;Gonzalez, 2022;Hammelman et al, 2022;Martin et al, 2021;Sovacool, 2021;Sultana, 2022a;Tozzi et al, 2022). These scholarships are worth engaging with closely and building upon.…”

Energy and Environmental Justice in China: Literature Review and Research Agenda

“…In addition, political ecology is defined as the study of environmental conflicts [109,110], whereby conflict is conceptualized as "a recurring, historically-driven, and multiscalar socio-environmental process" [39]. Thus, a focus on conflicts through an analysis of the powers exercised by the implementors and resistors of environmental interventions would offer a conceptual starting point to elaborate on an understanding of justice associated with politics [111]. Hence, conflicts over environmental justice are a central concern in the field of political ecology [20].…”

“…Given the connections between the two fields, political ecology offers a distinctive approach to understanding the meaning of power and its utilization, thereby, enriching EEJ scholarship by refining and expanding its theoretical and political repertoire [111]. For example, focusing on the connection of political ecology with peace and conflict studies, Le Billon and Duffy [39] highlighted the uneven power relations in the struggles over resources and the environment, and in engaging with socio-environmental relations and materiality through discussions about the three domains of EEJ conflict -renewable resources, extractive sectors, and climate change [39].…”

Making Justice the Subject of Resettlement Planning

“…Justice is not an abstract, universal (or Western) concept that can be standardised; it is a contextual concept that should be negotiated, always with "ends in view", according to individual subjectivity that is situated in personal, cultural, and physical environments (Wright 2007). Justice as subject is thus naturally multidimensional as it reflects different concerns of citizens who are not a homogeneous group (Gonzalez 2021;Mabele 2020) and are affected by the changed environments at different times of their resettled lives. Therefore, agreements made in pre-resettlement consultations on compensation and livelihood reconstruction cannot be the objectives of resettlement planning; each is merely a starting point to reflect on what the fairness of benefit distribution could look like according to the envisioned quality life.…”