What kind of innovation state matters for social justice? Learning from Poulantzas and going beyond

Abstract

In the twenty-first century, the notion of the state and its role in innovation and development have become dominant topics of theoretical and empirical inquiry. Although contemporary innovation theorists clearly unpack the myth of market fundamentalism in industrial policy and practice of neo-liberal states, they do not seem to explain precisely how come such states have been justified to play extensive roles in the economy. This paper provides a theoretical explanation by drawing lessons from Poulantzas’ approach to the state and going beyond it to consider alternatives. Accordingly, it conceives the innovation state as a result of the social division of labour and as a condensation of conflicting social relations which have their own materiality. The paper argues that whatever form the innovation state has taken in the western world since the industrial revolution, this has remained predominantly capitalist. Thus, it reproduces the social division of labour that is exploitative and unjust, delivering most benefits of innovation to dominant classes and excluding the very poor and the marginalised. The kind of innovation state that matters for social justice is a non-capitalist one, promoting pluralism of societies of equals through innovation.

Regional Disparities in Embracing Work-from-Home: A Focus on the EU

“…Since productivity growth is crucial for reducing income, wealth, and opportunity inequality (Arestis 2020), WFH may have signi cant long-term implications for regional development. These outcomes, however, are heavily dependent on state policies, which play a vital role in promoting innovation and technological change (Papaioannou 2023). Further research is needed on how state initiatives can support the adoption of WFH arrangements to foster regional development.…”